Agree with Cheolsoo, backward compatibility is important. We don't want to introduce backward compatibility issue later in 0.14. Any compelling reason to release 0.13 now? Can we wait until backward compatibility changes are done and the trunk is stabilized?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am fine either way. But we should be aware that API changes are somewhat > necessary given ScriptState is not refactored properly now. > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Prashant Kommireddi > <prash1...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I would be in favor of "More Frequent Releases" - minor and bug fixes >> provided we have enough to warrant one. With 0.13, there are enough new >> features/bug fixes/improvements to make a release soon IMO. And it might >> possibly take some effort to stabilize 0.13 (even without PIG-3591). >> >> Cheolsoo - how about branching 0.13 without PIG-3591, including it for 0.14 >> and taking time to test/stabilize the next version? >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Or we perhaps wait until we stabilize trunk first. Given that PIG-3591 is >> > necessary to implement a non-MR execution engine, it would make sense to >> > include it in addition to PIG-3419 in 0.13. Furthermore, I'm refactoring >> > ScriptState class while implementing PPNL for Tez. If we want to avoid >> API >> > changes after 0.13, we might spend more time before the release. >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > If we are going to release 0.13.0 in 1-2 months time frame, we shall >> > > definitely branch before check in PIG-3591. PIG-3591 could introduce >> > > regressions and we need time to stabilize it. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Daniel >> > > >> > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy >> > > <rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > Aniket wanted to make a 0.13 release. Recently we checked in >> > > > PIG-3591: Refactor POPackage to separate MR specific code from >> > packaging >> > > ( >> > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1585283) which >> is >> > a >> > > lot >> > > > of change. I think we should create the branch-0.13 before this >> > revision >> > > > and start putting only important or critical patches in 0.13 there >> > after. >> > > > Thoughts? >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > Rohini >> > > >> > > -- >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or >> entity >> > to >> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, >> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >> reader >> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified >> > that >> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender >> > immediately >> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >> > > >> > >> -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
