Does not make sense for Pinot On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:10 PM siddharth teotia <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think at some point we should think about using Jepsen for safety-testing > of Pinot. While the tool has been predominantly used in databases that > have distributed transactions, extensive node communication, algorithms > relying on clock-skew, it can still be used to introduced faults in the > cluster and check for existence of problems. > > I believe Helix and ZK are the perfect candidates (but that work is going > to be orthogonal to Pinot). However, since we use these extensively, it > might still be worthwhile to see if Jepsen framework can expose some > problems in Pinot. > > https://jepsen.io/ > > Thanks, > Sidd >
