We should define a new set of tests for derived systems On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:13 PM kishore g <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does not make sense for Pinot > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:10 PM siddharth teotia < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I think at some point we should think about using Jepsen for >> safety-testing >> of Pinot. While the tool has been predominantly used in databases that >> have distributed transactions, extensive node communication, algorithms >> relying on clock-skew, it can still be used to introduced faults in the >> cluster and check for existence of problems. >> >> I believe Helix and ZK are the perfect candidates (but that work is going >> to be orthogonal to Pinot). However, since we use these extensively, it >> might still be worthwhile to see if Jepsen framework can expose some >> problems in Pinot. >> >> https://jepsen.io/ >> >> Thanks, >> Sidd >> >
