> I'd also suggest that Startree work on training their marketing and sales
team on working with Apache projects.

May I ask you to be more specific here? I've been doing some internal
training in the past two months to help with problems like the one I'm
rectifying here. Maintaining proper boundaries and ASF branding guidelines
is important.


On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 3:48 PM Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> As an Apache member observer, unless the project wants to abandon Slack,
> it seems to me that Startree should make a new Slack workspace rather than
> taking the Apache Pinot one.
>
> I'd also suggest that Startree work on training their marketing and sales
> team on working with Apache projects. Take a look at Alan Gate's
> presentation on 'Training Our Teams on the Apache Way.'
> https://youtu.be/uFNE0IpKOxU
>
> .. Owen
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:17 PM Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I also definitely agree that Startree has put a tremendous effort to grow
>> the ASF Pinot community slack channel and helping people for
>> troubleshooting/debug the issue.
>>
>> On the other hand, the community slack channel was created as part of the
>> Apache incubation process and this workspace has always been regarded as
>> one of the community growth metrics for ASF Pinot.
>>
>> As Sidd mentioned, a lot of ASF Pinot-related discussions are happening
>> in the slack channel (e.g. contributor/committer/pmc discussions, cross org
>> collaboration on the features etc). From what Tim is highlighting, I think
>> that maybe it is better to keep a separate workspace: one for Startree
>> customers and the other for only ASF Pinot users and contributors.
>>
>> Best,
>> Seunghyun
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:00 PM siddharth teotia <
>> siddharthteo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tim,
>>>
>>> Thank you for sharing this.
>>>
>>> > StarTree is committed to making Pinot famous—that’s my actual job, in
>>> fact—and to helping users of the open-source project be successful with it,
>>> but we need to keep the boundaries between the ASF and StarTree clearly
>>> defined. Renaming this Slack is an important part of that distinction
>>>
>>> I understand where you are coming from and why you may want to keep
>>> distinction between ASF Pinot and Startree. However, I am not quite sure
>>> how renaming this is going to help with distinction because then all the
>>> ASF Pinot related conversations (between contributors / committers / PMCs
>>> for release, PR, issue etc discussion) will have to go through Startree
>>> workspace which may not be the correct place to do so because these
>>> discussions are orthogonal to Startree or any company using / contributing
>>> to ASF Pinot.
>>>
>>> This workspace was initially created to help grow the ASF Pinot
>>> community and have the related discussions there. I completely agree that
>>> Startree has done a great job in bringing more folks to the workspace,
>>> helping them on a day to day basis etc. However, renaming will actually
>>> blur the distinction to be honest.
>>>
>>> Shall we discuss this to see if there is any alternative to achieve this
>>> distinction ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sidd
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:56 AM Tim Berglund <tlbergl...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Pinot Dev,
>>>>
>>>> I’m Tim Berglund. The barest intro of me: I run Developer Relations at
>>>> StarTree. I wanted to go over a change I’m making to our Slack workspace so
>>>> it is not a surprise to you and we have a chance to talk through any
>>>> questions.
>>>>
>>>> On June 1, 2022, we will rename the Apache Pinot™ Slack Workspace to
>>>> the StarTree Community Slack Workspace. Let me explain my thinking here.
>>>>
>>>> First, of the top ten lifetime contributors in this Slack, six are
>>>> StarTree employees, accounting for about 80% of messages. I’m concerned by
>>>> the StarTree-heavy presence in a workspace that borrows the Apache
>>>> branding. It made sense to name the workspace “Apache Pinot” when Kishore
>>>> first made it, but as its usage has evolved and will continue to evolve,
>>>> keeping the Apache name is not appropriate. StarTree is committed to making
>>>> Pinot famous—that’s my actual job, in fact—and to helping users of the
>>>> open-source project be successful with it, but we need to keep the
>>>> boundaries between the ASF and StarTree clearly defined. Renaming this
>>>> Slack is an important part of that distinction, and something I’d rather do
>>>> sooner than later.
>>>>
>>>> Second, the continued evolution of the workspace is sure to include
>>>> channels to support StarTree’s cloud service and other community-licensed
>>>> products we might release in the future. Our broad commitment to and
>>>> investment in the support and advocacy for Apache Pinot will remain.
>>>> Renaming of the Slack will not cause it to become a place for vendor sales
>>>> pitches. (Indeed, those are forbidden, and sales people who come into Slack
>>>> to sell will answer to me.)
>>>>
>>>> The Slack is home to many other community members who have no
>>>> association with the ASF at all, and of course will continue to be an
>>>> inclusive space open to anyone who wants to talk about Pinot. It’s our goal
>>>> for it to continue to grow and thrive, and for StarTree to continue to
>>>> invest heavily in it as a helpful and welcoming place.
>>>>
>>>> Warmly,
>>>>
>>>> Tim Berglund
>>>>
>>>> VP Developer Relations
>>>> StarTree
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to