Hi Guys, So, it occurs to me that I'm not the best with Apache protocol yet... (any tips would be greatly appreciated!)
To that end, let's discuss whether or not we should adopt a RTC (Review Then Commit) or a CTR (Commit then Review) commit philosophy for Pirk. As I understand it, if we adopt RTC, then a pull request must get a +1 from another committer before the pull request can be accepted/merged. If we adopt a CTR, then a committer can accept a pull request when they are ready with a reviewer (optionally) going back and checking it out. Thoughts? Thanks! Ellison Anne
