I am cool with someone else playing the RM role, lets plan for a release early next week in time for October incubator report.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Walter Ray-Dulany <[email protected]> wrote: > No objections, and I would defer to the community on numbering (which right > now means I defer to Tim ;) ). > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Ellison Anne Williams < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Happy to be the RM again or give another committer the 'privilege' -- if > I > > don't hear otherwise, I will take it this month and someone else can > assume > > the duties in October. > > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On 24 September 2016 at 19:58, Ellison Anne Williams < > > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > In the spirit of release often (~1x per month), I would like to > execute > > > > another release in about a week (next Friday/Saturday). Any > objections? > > > > > > > > If not, would you prefer that this release be 0.1.1 or 0.2.0? > > > > > > > > Darin - If the initial submodule refactor is completed by then, it > > would > > > be > > > > a great addition to the release. If not, we will plan to roll it into > > the > > > > October release. > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > > > I don't have a strong feeling about the name, until we get to the 1.0.0 > > > release when we should adopt a major.minor.patch semantic version > naming > > > scheme. FWIW I'd probably pick 0.2.0. > > > > > > Are you volunteering to be RM again? We should rotate the 'privilege', > > but > > > there will be opportunities to do that with frequent releases. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Tim > > > > > >
