None here. On Sep 25, 2016 3:55 PM, "Ellison Anne Williams" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Was thinking that we could plan to execute the release for dev@ voting on > Friday/Saturday. > > Even if we rolled the release for voting today, we can't make a September > release date with the sequential voting process on dev@ and on general@. > > Any objections? > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Jacob Wilder < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 for the release > > > > — > > Jacob Wilder > > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Darin Johnson <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > I think it's very possible I can have things done by the end of next > > week. > > > There may be some minor issues that may move part of it into next week. > > > > > > I'm +1 (non binding) for 0.2.0. > > > > > > Darin > > > > > > On Sep 24, 2016 2:58 PM, "Ellison Anne Williams" < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > In the spirit of release often (~1x per month), I would like to > execute > > > > another release in about a week (next Friday/Saturday). Any > objections? > > > > > > > > If not, would you prefer that this release be 0.1.1 or 0.2.0? > > > > > > > > Darin - If the initial submodule refactor is completed by then, it > > would > > > be > > > > a great addition to the release. If not, we will plan to roll it into > > the > > > > October release. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Ellison Anne > > > > > > > > > >
