Hi Greg > Re: other data types - yes, those can and probably should be added. Just > didn't have a need for them when I wrote it. Ok, so do you think it would be a good thing to reopen the ticket, or better to open another one as improvement or new feature ?
> Re: result set metadata - I don't think we need it. The ResultList.Field > class specifies the desired value type. If the type is null, the default type > returned by the result set is used. Yes, I was thinking if metadata gave us more freedom, but probably you have reason, it's not needed. > Re: more compact formatting - that is up to the serializer you use. If you > want a more compact format, you can use CSVSerializer instead of > JSONSerializer. Uh, i never use the CSVSerializer and probably this is the most useful in this case ... But I'm interested also to see what happen after adding the other data types ... Tell me if I can help on this. Bye
