>> Re: other data types - yes, those can and probably should be added. Just >> didn't have a need for them when I wrote it. > Ok, so do you think it would be a good thing to reopen the ticket, or > better to open another one as improvement or new feature ?
You can reopen it if you like. >> Re: more compact formatting - that is up to the serializer you use. If you >> want a more compact format, you can use CSVSerializer instead of >> JSONSerializer. > Uh, i never use the CSVSerializer and probably this is the most useful > in this case ... > But I'm interested also to see what happen after adding the other data types > ... CSVSerializer simply converts all values to strings by calling toString().
