BeanAdapterTestObject is not a JUnit test, but its name matches the
inclusion criteria.
<fileset dir="@{project}/test" includes="**/*Test*.java"/>
So I guess it just needs to be renamed.XMLSerializerTest *is* a valid test that is failing when checking equality of Elements. Anyone done anything related to this recently? (SVN access is slow for me right now, so checking history is painful) Chris On 23 June 2011 01:40, Roger L. Whitcomb <[email protected]> wrote: > I ran "ant test" against head revs just now and got two failures: > [junit] Test org.apache.pivot.beans.test.BeanAdapterTestObject FAILED > [junit] Test org.apache.pivot.xml.test.XMLSerializerTest FAILED > > Haven't looked into things further than this. > > Roger Whitcomb | Architect, Engineering | [email protected] | > Ingres | 500 Arguello Street | Suite 200 | Redwood City | CA | 94063 | > USA +1 650-587-5596 | fax: +1 650-587-5550 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Bartlett [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:29 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: 2.0.1 release > > Yep, 6 months is way too long, but with only a few committers whose time > is > limited, it has just ended up that way. > > Hopefully Piotr's road map question and Greg's friendly push will be > enough > to kick start the 2.0.1 process.. > > On 23 June 2011 01:20, Edvin Syse <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think 6 months is long between each release, but if you release > snapshots > > atleast each month and update the webpage to show info on the latest > > snapshot, you can atleast show that the project is moving forward :) > > > > Den 22.06.2011 20:04, skrev Chris Bartlett: > > > > I'm not sure there would be enough changes to justify official > *releases* > >> as > >> regularly as one per month, but I imagine that regular snapshot > builds > >> could > >> be made available for download. > >> > >> http://ci.apache.org/ > >> I will try to read up on what is available to us. > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> On 23 June 2011 00:16, Greg Brown<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Get the latest source from SVN and build/test the release artifacts > (run > >>> the demos/tutorials/test apps and make sure that nothing is broken). > Once > >>> validated, a release vote can be called for (though a PMC member > will > >>> need > >>> to do that part). > >>> > >>> Releasing once a month would be aggressive. But if someone is > willing to > >>> take responsibility for it, I don't see any reason why not. > >>> > >>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: > >>> > >>> what is involved in "get the ball rolling"? > >>>> > >>>> can you start releasing 2.0.x versions once a month? > >>>> > >>>> -------- Original Message -------- > >>>> Subject: 2.0.1 release > >>>> From: Greg Brown<[email protected]> > >>>> To: Pivot Dev<[email protected]> > >>>> Date: Wed 22 Jun 2011 10:16:40 AM CDT > >>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I think the 2.0.1 release is long overdue. Open-source projects > without > >>>>> > >>>> frequent releases seem dead and lose users. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> I unfortunately cannot drive the process, but I can help validate > the > >>>>> > >>>> release if someone is willing to get the ball rolling. Are there > any > >>> volunteers? > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> Greg > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> >
