Hi Benedict, thanks for providing your work … I know there was at least one further person planning on working on the SCALA api.
In general, I usually only rebase if I haven’t pushed anything. I think we should never break someone elses work just for the sake of a cleaner commit graph. As we never quite know if some potentially new committer has started to work on something, I think we shouldn’t do that. So, my opinion would be to merge. But I think this would be a good topic to start discussing here. Especially the new born Apaches are encouraged to join the discussion Chris Am 22.12.17, 10:20 schrieb "Benedikt Ritter" <[email protected]>: Hi all, I’ve just pushed the work I’ve started a few weeks ago on the Scala API to the gitbox repo. The branch is called PLC4X-12 (the name of the lira issue). The branch is currently outdated, because we introduced some changes to the Java API after started my work. I never got around to bringing the branch up to date with current master. But maybe somebody wants to continue working on the Scala API, so there it is :o) I don’t think we have agreed on how to work with git yet. Do we want to rebase the branch thereby potentially breaking peoples working copies or do we simply merge master to the PLC4X-12 branch? Cheers, Benedikt
