dev  

Messages by Thread

• [DISCUSS] How/where should I start my work on the SPI 3.0? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How/where should I start my work on the SPI 3.0? Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: [DISCUSS] How/where should I start my work on the SPI 3.0? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] How/where should I start my work on the SPI 3.0? Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: AW: [DISCUSS] How/where should I start my work on the SPI 3.0? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] How/where should I start my work on the SPI 3.0? Sebastian Rühl
• [DISCUSS] Remove the option to pass raw values to write operations? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Remove the option to pass raw values to write operations? Lukas via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Remove the option to pass raw values to write operations? QuanticPony
• [DISCUSS] Do we want to add a "Call Function" API to our API? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to add a "Call Function" API to our API? Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to add a "Call Function" API to our API? Ben Hutcheson
• [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
  • Re: [D] About contributing to plc4x and potential gsoc 2026 participation via GitHub
• My proposals for upcoming research-fund-financed work Christofer Dutz
  • Re: My proposals for upcoming research-fund-financed work Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: My proposals for upcoming research-fund-financed work Lukas via dev
  • AW: My proposals for upcoming research-fund-financed work Christofer Dutz
  • AW: My proposals for upcoming research-fund-financed work Christofer Dutz
• Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Christofer Dutz
  • AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: AW: AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Christofer Dutz
  • AW: AW: AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: AW: AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Łukasz Dywicki
  • AW: AW: AW: AW: Suggestion to introduce dedicated repos for API, SPI and languages Christofer Dutz
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2750]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2747]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2748]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2745]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2741]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2742]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2736]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2737]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [DISCUSS] Start preparing for Maven 4? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Start preparing for Maven 4? Sebastian Rühl
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2733]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2734]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [DISCUSS] Re-Using PlcRequests with multiple connections? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Re-Using PlcRequests with multiple connections? Łukasz Dywicki
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Re-Using PlcRequests with multiple connections? Christofer Dutz
• [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2730]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2725]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2726]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2707]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? Lukas
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? niclas
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? niclas
  • AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? Christofer Dutz
  • AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? Christofer Dutz
  • AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Downgrade the Java version for only the plc4j-api module? Christofer Dutz
• [DISCUSS] Do we want to make communication a requirement before merging PRs? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to make communication a requirement before merging PRs? Lukas
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Do we want to make communication a requirement before merging PRs? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Do we want to make communication a requirement before merging PRs? Łukasz Dywicki
• Slightly update the Browse API Christofer Dutz
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2704]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2712]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2713]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2706]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2702]' Apache Jenkins Server
• Re: [I] [Bug]: (S7-light) Issue when reading multiple variables from the same address Christofer Dutz
• Update ... we had loads of tests not running for many months ... this is causing "issues" Christofer Dutz
  • AW: Update ... we had loads of tests not running for many months ... this is causing "issues" Christofer Dutz
• [DISCUSS] Streamline the usage of attributes in mspec Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Streamline the usage of attributes in mspec Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Streamline the usage of attributes in mspec Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Streamline the usage of attributes in mspec Sebastian Rühl
• [DISCUSS] Cleanly handling encoding in mspec Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cleanly handling encoding in mspec Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Cleanly handling encoding in mspec Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Cleanly handling encoding in mspec Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Cleanly handling encoding in mspec Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Cleanly handling encoding in mspec Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Cleanly handling encoding in mspec Łukasz Dywicki
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Cleanly handling encoding in mspec Christofer Dutz
• [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Make "curPos" a bit-position? Łukasz Dywicki
• [D] Subscribe OPC/UA Node via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Subscribe OPC/UA Node via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Subscribe OPC/UA Node via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Subscribe OPC/UA Node via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Subscribe OPC/UA Node via GitHub
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2666]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2667]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2664]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [PR] chore(deps): bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin from 3.11.1 to 3.11.3 [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils from 1.9.4 to 1.11.0 [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4 to 5 [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-plugin from 3.1.1 to 3.1.4 [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/setup-java from 4 to 5 [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump BobAnkh/auto-generate-changelog from 1.2.5 to 1.3.0 [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin from 3.13.0 to 3.14.0 [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-plugin from 3.8.0 to 3.9.0 [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2650]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X Build-Tools/develop [develop] [219]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2652]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2653]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2654]' Apache Jenkins Server
  • [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2655]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2648]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [RESULT][VOTE] Drop Java 11 go to Java 21 Sebastian Rühl
• [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.1 RC1 Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.1 RC1 ott . lukas
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.1 RC1 Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.1 RC1 Christofer Dutz
  • AW: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.1 RC1 Christofer Dutz
  • [RESULT][VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.1 RC1 Christofer Dutz
• [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2644]' Apache Jenkins Server
• [Vote] Drop Java 11 go to Java 21 Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: [Vote] Drop Java 11 go to Java 21 Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: [Vote] Drop Java 11 go to Java 21 Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [Vote] Drop Java 11 go to Java 21 Cesar Garcia
  • Re: [Vote] Drop Java 11 go to Java 21 Jinlin Hong
• [PR] Improve the code generation even more ... [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve the code generation even more ... [plc4x-build-tools] via GitHub
• [DISCUSS] Remove deprecated "enum" field type? Christofer Dutz
• [DISCUSS] introduce an explicit field type for parser arguments? Christofer Dutz
  • AW: [DISCUSS] introduce an explicit field type for parser arguments? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] introduce an explicit field type for parser arguments? Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] introduce an explicit field type for parser arguments? Łukasz Dywicki
  • AW: AW: [DISCUSS] introduce an explicit field type for parser arguments? Christofer Dutz
• [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.13.1 rc1 Christofer Dutz
• [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.13.1 rc1 Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.13.1 rc1 ott . lukas
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.13.1 rc1 Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.13.1 rc1 Jinlin Hong
  • AW: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.13.1 rc1 Christofer Dutz
  • [RESULT][VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.13.1 rc1 Christofer Dutz
• [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [2629]' Apache Jenkins Server
• Do a follow-up release? Christofer Dutz
  • Re: Do a follow-up release? ott . lukas
  • Re: Do a follow-up release? Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: Do a follow-up release? Christofer Dutz
• [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC2 Christofer Dutz
  • AW: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC2 Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC2 ott . lukas
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC2 Cesar Garcia
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC2 QuanticPony
  • [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC2 Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC2 Sebastian Rühl
• [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support ott . lukas
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support niclas
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support Cesar Garcia
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support Christofer Dutz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support [email protected]
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support Christofer Dutz
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support Christofer Dutz
  • Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support Sebastian Rühl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support Sebastian Rühl
  • AW: [DISCUSS] Interesting idea about old-java-version support Christofer Dutz
• [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building PLC4X-Extra - Failing log via GitHub
• [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC1 Christofer Dutz
  • AW: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Extras 0.13.0 RC1 Christofer Dutz
• [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Building with Linux failing via GitHub

• Earlier messages