Hi, I currently have a strong tendency to accept Niclas' proposal as soon as he creates a pull-request for his changes. So If I don't hear any objections within the next 1-2 days. I'll merge that.
Chris Am 12.02.18, 09:51 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com>: Hi, > Even if I like the way AssertJ handles exceptions a bit more than the Hamcrest way, I never was particularly fond of never-ending fluent expressions. So I would opt for the Hamcrest version. No strong view either way as any tests are good to have :-) But I have used Hamcrest in the past and that’s what I’m familiar with. Niclas’ change looks good to me. Thanks, Justin