I currently have a strong tendency to accept Niclas' proposal as soon as he 
creates a pull-request for his changes.
So If I don't hear any objections within the next 1-2 days. I'll merge that.


Am 12.02.18, 09:51 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com>:

    > Even if I like the way AssertJ handles exceptions a bit more than the 
Hamcrest way, I never was particularly fond of never-ending fluent expressions. 
So I would opt for the Hamcrest version.
    No strong view either way as any tests are good to have :-) But I have used 
Hamcrest in the past and that’s what I’m familiar with. Niclas’ change looks 
good to me.

Reply via email to