Hi, > Sonar[1] reports 158 code smells but those don’t seem to include any of the > categories of the 235 noted below. Not sure what to make of that.
It could be that some rules have been turned off? I’m also seeing some sonar cube one that are legitimate issues but nothing too serious. Some of the issues are due to code that is not complete yet. And a couple of others it probably best not to fix until we have code coverage by tests in that area. > At least an overwhelming number of the 235 are legitimate. E.g., one should > use a generic type in a generic way instead of as a raw type; there are in > fact unnecessary @SuppressWarning instances and missing javadoc tags, etc. If you think they are legitimate please raise an issue and/or go ahead and fix them. Thanks, Justin
