Ok great .. thanks :-) I'll have a look if I could add it in the future. Just never tried cause I thought it was something mentors have to do ;-)
Chris Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen ________________________________ From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 8:49:16 AM To: dev@plc4x.apache.org Subject: Re: [DRAFT] March Podling Report PLC4X I can sign-off as well, as I have been following the discussion here. Also, let me know if you don't have access to the wiki I can add it there (you can ask for access at general@), Otherwise, let me know when it's published to the wiki and I can sign-off. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > I don't think you need Mentor to do it. I have added it... > > I see Justin being Mentor, so _should_ be easy to get a sign-off. > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > > wrote: > > > Hi Niclas, > > > > I'll keep that in mind for the next report, could one of the mentors > > please add the report for me (I think this has to be a mentor) > > > > Chris > > > > Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen > > > > ________________________________ > > From: hedh...@gmail.com <hedh...@gmail.com> on behalf of Niclas Hedhman > < > > nic...@hedhman.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 2:09:07 AM > > To: dev@plc4x.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DRAFT] March Podling Report PLC4X > > > > I think it is still a lot more detail than needed, but I don't think you > > need to spend more time on making it smaller this time around. Maybe the > > Incubator is more fuzzy than the Board, since "How has the project > > developed since the last report?" invites a lot more technical detail > than > > what the Board care about, which is "community health", "are people > getting > > along", "are releases made", "any new committers and PMC members", "any > > trademark issues with 3rd parties", "publicity and conferences" and stuff > > like that. > > > > If you look at TLP reports, e.g. > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/ > > 2018/board_minutes_2018_02_21.txt, > > you should notice that mostly non-technical stuff gets to the board. > > > > > > Cheers > > NIclas > > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Christofer Dutz < > christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Ok ... so here a little less verbose version ... this ok? > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > --------------------------- > > > > > > Apache PLC4X (incubating) > > > > > > > > > PLC4X is a set of libraries for communicating with industrial > > programmable > > > logic controllers (PLCs) using a variety of protocols but with a shared > > API. > > > > > > > > > Most important issues to address while moving towards graduation: > > > > > > Building the community: The PPMC and committer group has a large > > > percentage of codecentric employees, we have been recruiting people > from > > > other companies, but will have to continue these efforts for > > establishing a > > > healthy Apache community. > > > Onboarding of new committers: With PLC4X several people on the team are > > > not very familiar with the Apache Way. We have started and will > continue > > > our efforts on this onboarding. > > > Make our first release > > > > > > Any Issues the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware > of: > > > > > > In contrast to previous reports some of the concerns regarding > > > availability and usability of specifications have been resolved. > > Especially > > > for using the Modbus and the OPC-UA specifications Christofer was able > to > > > get official permissions from the corresponding foundations to use the > > > specifications. These permission Emails have been filed in the private > > list > > > for documentation. > > > > > > One of the external foundations (Profinet) doesn’t have a free > > membership. > > > In general, the CEO of the European branch of the Profinet Foundation > has > > > signaled that it should be possible for the ASF to become a member and > > have > > > an outside company pay the membership fees, but we have to discuss the > > > details (With them as well as the ASF). > > > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > > > Christofer has invested most of his time in March spreading the word > > about > > > PLC4X. > > > A first POC has been created for a company which is currently going > into > > > production > > > An article about Apache Edgent and Apache PLC4X has been published as a > > > cover-story in the German JavaSPEKTRUM magazines Industrial IoT special > > > edition (https://www.sigs-datacom.de/digital/javaspektrum/). One PLC4X > > > talk has been accepted to the Apache EU Roadshow 2018 in Berlin and one > > > will be at the Silpion Techcamp in Hamburg (https://techcamp.hamburg/) > > in > > > the first April week. > > > > > > The dev-list subscriptions has gone up by one from February, we are > > hoping > > > to increase the number in the next few weeks (However quite some emails > > > come in from un-registered users that have to pass moderation). > > > > > > We now have a Twitter account: https://twitter.com/ApachePlc4x as > > another > > > channel of communicating interesting PLC4X facts. > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > > > We have been working hard on making better use of the ASF build > > > infrastructure. Especially regarding setting up our project VM at > > > plc4x-vm.apache.org this effort will be continued. > > > After receiving the permission to use and implement the Modbus > protocol, > > > the Driver skeletons have been setup, but no real implementation of the > > > protocol itself has been done yet. We are still hoping for volunteers > to > > > step up as interest in implementing the Modbus protocol has been > > explicitly > > > mentioned by community memebers. > > > The work on the RawSocket Netty transport which is a requirement to > > > implement protocols that are IP based, but are not TCP or UDP has > > continued > > > and we are currently working on some of the quirks on Linux based > > > operating-systems. > > > We added Netty support for IO over serial ports and will be using this > in > > > the Beckhoff module as a first protocol. > > > We are still working on the S7 Protocol fragmentation and hope to be > able > > > to finish this in April. > > > Also we discussed on the list about how the others would think of > > > initiating a first release of PLC4X. > > > > > > How does the podling rate their own maturity? > > > > > > We have a mix of new participants and experienced Apache people > involved. > > > So far, the new participants have shown great willingness and success > in > > > adopting the Apache Way. > > > However, we still need to continue: > > > the on-boarding > > > increasing the diversity of the team > > > Also, will we need to decide and establish all the processes involved > in > > > releasing software at Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 31.03.18, 05:25 schrieb "hedh...@gmail.com im Auftrag von Niclas > > > Hedhman" <hedh...@gmail.com im Auftrag von nic...@hedhman.org>: > > > > > > IMHO, it is a bit long and details more than the Board needs to > know. > > > > > > In general, there is a tendency to not want to see company names > > > splurted > > > around, and perhaps all the PLC4X-specific terms could be shortened > > > into > > > generic technical language, and shortened. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Niclas > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 3:09 AM, Christofer Dutz < > > > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Ok … a little earlier than expected … please comment :-) > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > --------------------------- > > > > > > > > Apache PLC4X (incubating) > > > > > > > > > > > > PLC4X is a set of libraries for communicating with industrial > > > programmable > > > > logic controllers (PLCs) using a variety of protocols but with a > > > shared API. > > > > > > > > > > > > Most important issues to address while moving towards graduation: > > > > > > > > Building the community: The PPMC and committer group has a large > > > > percentage of codecentric employees, we have been recruiting > people > > > from > > > > other companies, but will have to continue these efforts for > > > establishing a > > > > healthy Apache community. > > > > Onboarding of new committers: With PLC4X several people on the > team > > > are > > > > not very familiar with the Apache Way. We have started and will > > > continue > > > > our efforts on this onboarding. > > > > Make our first release > > > > > > > > Any Issues the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be > > > aware of: > > > > > > > > In contrast to previous reports some of the concerns regarding > > > > availability and usability of specifications have been resolved. > > > Especially > > > > for using the Modbus and the OPC-UA specifications Christofer was > > > able to > > > > get official permissions from the corresponding foundations to > use > > > the > > > > specifications. These permission Emails have been filed in the > > > private list > > > > for documentation. > > > > > > > > One of the external foundations (Profinet) doesn’t have a free > > > membership. > > > > In general, the CEO of the European branch of the Profinet > > > Foundation has > > > > signaled that it should be possible for the ASF to become a > member > > > and have > > > > an outside company pay the membership fees, but we have to > discuss > > > the > > > > details (With them as well as the ASF). > > > > > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > > > > > Christofer has invested most of his time in March spreading the > > word > > > about > > > > PLC4X. > > > > A first POC has been created for the company “Kampf Schneid- und > > > > Wickeltechnik GmbH & Co. KG” which is currently going into > > production > > > > An article about Apache Edgent and Apache PLC4X has been > published > > > as a > > > > cover-story in the German JavaSPEKTRUM magazines Industrial IoT > > > special > > > > edition (https://www.sigs-datacom.de/digital/javaspektrum/). One > > > PLC4X > > > > talk has been accepted to the Apache EU Roadshow 2018 in Berlin > and > > > one > > > > will be at the Silpion Techcamp in Hamburg ( > > > https://techcamp.hamburg/) in > > > > the first April week. > > > > > > > > The dev-list subscriptions has gone up by one from February, we > are > > > hoping > > > > to increase the number in the next few weeks (However quite some > > > emails > > > > come in from un-registered users that have to pass moderation). > > > > > > > > We now have a Twitter account: https://twitter.com/ApachePlc4x > as > > > another > > > > channel of communicating interesting PLC4X facts. > > > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > > > > > Sebastian worked hard on replacing the scripted Jenkins pipeline > > > > definition to a declarative version. > > > > After receiving the permission to use and implement the Modbus > > > protocol, > > > > the Driver skeletons have been setup, but no real implementation > of > > > the > > > > protocol itself has been done yet. We are still hoping for > > > volunteers to > > > > step up as interest in implementing the Modbus protocol has been > > > explicitly > > > > mentioned by community memebers. > > > > Thanks to infra’s new self-service service we are now able to > > resolve > > > > problems with out-of-sync websites on our own and a lot faster > than > > > before. > > > > We recently received the requested project VM, which we are > > currently > > > > setting up. Hopefully as soon as that’s done, we’ll be able to > run > > > tests on > > > > the non TCP and UDP protocols. The work on the RawSocket Netty > > > transport > > > > which is a requirement to implement protocols that are IP based, > > but > > > are > > > > not TCP or UDP has continued and we are currently working on some > > of > > > the > > > > quirks on Linux based operating-systems. > > > > We added Netty support for IO over serial ports and will be using > > > this in > > > > the Beckhoff module as a first protocol. > > > > We are still working on the S7 Protocol fragmentation and hope to > > be > > > able > > > > to finish this in April. > > > > Also we discussed on the list about how the others would think of > > > > initiating a first release of PLC4X. > > > > > > > > How does the podling rate their own maturity? > > > > > > > > We have a mix of new participants and experienced Apache people > > > involved. > > > > So far, the new participants have shown great willingness and > > > success in > > > > adopting the Apache Way. > > > > However, we still need to continue: > > > > the on-boarding > > > > increasing the diversity of the team > > > > Also, will we need to decide and establish all the processes > > > involved in > > > > releasing software at Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java > > > > > > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
