Hey, I had the exact same discussion with Sebastian on slack (he also suggested 0.2.0). Because he fixed Modbus and we want to have it releases : ) So I don’t care about the number that much as long as we do it regularly and prepare a 0.2.0 as a "(bug-)fixed" 0.1.0.
Its good that we're all on the same side here. Julian Am 26.09.18, 14:12 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: By the way ... Just noticed that I replied to the vote thread ... Should have been here. So please take the discussion here. Chris Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen ________________________________ From: Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 10:50:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 On 2018-09-24, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, >> * It looks as if plc4x-parent-0.1.0-rc2 was the git tag for the RC as it >> matches the source zip (which misses the .gitignore but includes an >> extra DEPDENDENCIES file, BTW). The name looks a little strange, is >> this going to be "fixed" for the final release? > As tags change be changed it’s best to include the git hash in the > vote email. True. Infra protects tags that start with "rel/" that's why the final tag should be named like this. Stefan
