So, the vote passes with 3 +1 votes by PPMC members and one +1 vote by a non 
PPMC member.

I’ll forward this to the incubator for approval. Also I'll update the GIT tag 
as suggested.

Chris

Am 26.09.18, 08:10 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>:

    Hi Julian,
    
    I agree, we should still ship it. I mean I know that there are issues. We 
couldn't have gotten everything right. And incubating releases don't have to be 
perfect.
    
    I would say we start releasing more regularly and simply fix the things we 
found and fixed in the next 0.2.0 release.
    
    We're not yet using real semver. I'll think we leave that to version 1.0.0.
    
    Chris
    
    
    
    Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen
    
    ________________________________
    From: Julian Feinauer <[email protected]>
    Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 4:08:50 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2
    
    Hi Andreas,
    
    thank you very much for your support (as I know to few about TIA 
programming to do it myself with our PLC here).
    I will try to dig into some of them the end of this or next week (if chris 
doesn’t do it first : )).
    
    I suggest to get the release going none the less (I think this is the usual 
way) and have a bugfix release soon (0.1.1) where such things are fixed.
    
    @chris: How is the procedure for hotfix releases (in semVer)? Always the 
same procedure?
    
    Julian
    
    Am 25.09.18, 14:12 schrieb "Uschold Andreas" 
<[email protected]>:
    
        I just did some tests with the S7 driver and found a couple of issues.
    
        PLC4X-56 [S7] S7Field does not recognize addresses with numElements 
present
        PLC4X-57 [S7] Response for address with numElements contains only first 
item
        PLC4X-58 [S7] Reading more then PDU with one request blocks calling 
thread indefinitly
        PLC4X-59 [S7] Reading a UDINT with value 0x00000000 and non positive 
floating point values does not work
    
        I found these issues while testing exotic / exceptional constellations, 
so for "normal" use cases they are probably not an issue.
    
        Andreas
    
        -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
        Von: Julian Feinauer [mailto:[email protected]]
        Gesendet: Montag, 24. September 2018 21:04
        An: [email protected]
        Betreff: [EXT] Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2
    
        +1 (contributor)
    
        Checks and build performed on Mac OS X.
    
        Checks performed:
        - Checked out using the new tooling: OK
        - Checked signatures: OK
        - Checked the zip correctly unpacks to the expected directory 
structure: OK
        - verify the existence of DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE, README, 
RELEASE_NOTES: OK
        - Built from sources (including tests) according to instructions in 
README: OK
        - All tests pass: OK
    
        Julian
    
        Am 24.09.18, 16:39 schrieb "Stefan Bodewig" <[email protected]>:
    
            On 2018-09-22, Christofer Dutz wrote:
    
            > Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2 has been staged under [2] and 
it’s
            > time to vote on accepting it for release.  All Maven artifacts are
            > available under [1].  If approved we will seek final release 
approval
            > from the IPMC.  Voting will be open for 72hr.
    
            +1
    
            I've got some questions (see other-thread) but nothing that would
            invalidate the RC.
    
            Stefan
    
    
    
    
    

Reply via email to