Hi all,

so I just added the RELEASE_NOTES for the new release. Hope I didn't miss 
anything essential. Please double-check everything needed is in there and 
nothing is wrong.

Also I re-evaluated the findings of the last release: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-60
I do have 1 or 2 questions:
1) In the last release we included code from the reflow maven skin and 
therefore added attributions to the NOTICE file. I did some changes and 
contributed things back to the original skin and now no longer need the forked 
code and therefore removed that. Can I now remove all the stuff from the 
src/remote-resources/NOTICE file?

2) Do we have to add anything for Netty in our LICENSE or NOTICE or wherever as 
mentioned in PLC4X-60? Are we good the way it is now?

Thanks,
Chris

Am 14.11.18, 17:46 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>:

    Ok,
    
    so now the release branch is created ... please do the pre-release 
candidate checking on this (At least building and testing would be a first step)
    I guess I could start creating an RC1 in a few days ... perhaps this 
weekend.
    
    !!!! AND BE SURE TO SWITCH TO THE DEVELOP BRANCH !!!! 
    (Sorry for yelling ... but this is important ;-) )
    
    
    Chris
    
    
    Am 13.11.18, 20:16 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>:
    
        Hi all,
        
        coming back from yet another conference, I am planning on using the day 
tomorrow to create the new branches and adjust our tooling accordingly as well 
as our documentation.
        
        So if you want anything special in the next release, you should speed 
up or you'll have to manually cherry pick commits.
        
        Chris
        
        
        Am 11.11.18, 15:55 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" 
<[email protected]>:
        
            Oh and thank you soo much for all the refactoring!! This makes 
things really stable.
            
            Julian
            ________________________________
            From: Julian Feinauer <[email protected]>
            Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2018 3:53:51 PM
            To: [email protected]
            Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] How about a new release some time soon?
            
            Full ack, +1
            ________________________________
            From: Sebastian Rühl <[email protected]>
            Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2018 1:50:41 PM
            To: [email protected]
            Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] How about a new release some time soon?
            
            Hi Chris,
            
            Sounds good to me +1
            
            Sebastian
            
            > Am 11.11.2018 um 13:31 schrieb Christofer Dutz 
<[email protected]>:
            >
            > Hi all,
            >
            > so after 2 full weeks of testing, refactoring etc. now also the 
driver-base module is above the 80% coverage threshold.
            >
            > So I think we should now start the process for releasing 0.2.0 
... what do you think?
            >
            > I would also like to also start a more mature branching strategy.
            > Till now we have been working on "master", I think we should 
change that.
            > So my proposal would be, that we spawn a "rel/0.2" branch and 
"develop" branch form the current "master" branch.
            > So we would do the release hardening on "rel/0.2" and continue 
the normal development on "develop". As soon as we do a release, we merge the 
stat of the "rel/0.2" release commit to master.
            > So anyone checking out the repo would get the latest release 
version.
            >
            > This procedure is quite the normal procedure for most open-source 
projects.
            >
            > Chris
            >
            >
            >
            > Am 07.11.18, 14:37 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" 
<[email protected]>:
            >
            >    Hi all,
            >
            >    so in the past few weeks I have been implementing tests and it 
was definitively worth the effort.
            >    As now almost all of the important modules are reaching the 
threshold of "no issues and vulnerabilities" and "test coverage x >= 80%"
            >    I think we should start the next release process soon.
            >
            >    So if you got something you want in the 0.2.0, step up, make 
yourself noticed and make sure it's in master soon.
            >
            >
            >    Chris
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >    Am 29.10.18, 21:28 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" 
<[email protected]>:
            >
            >        +1 from my side as well.
            >
            >        Am 29.10.18, 16:29 schrieb "Bahamada" 
<[email protected]>:
            >
            >            +1 from my side
            >
            >            Von: Christofer Dutz
            >            Gesendet: Montag, 29. Oktober 2018 15:17
            >            An: [email protected]
            >            Betreff: [DISCUSS] How about a new release some time 
soon?
            >
            >            Hi all,
            >
            >            after I think we addressed all the open issues 
reported during the last release and us doing some more refactoring, cleaning 
up, fixing things.
            >            I would propose us to do a new release some time soon.
            >
            >            I did encounter and fix quite a number of bugs that 
will under guarantee affect people trying out PLC4X.
            >
            >            And just yesterday I managed to fix the last reported 
bug in Sonar and address a lot of Code-Smells.
            >
            >            However I would feel better if we managed to increase 
the test-coverage a little more.
            >            I guess as soon as we pass the quality gate of at 
least 80%, we should initiate the release process.
            >
            >            Also I guess we shouldn’t all blindly start working on 
the same parts, we should coordinate a little more here.
            >            So I, for myself will be concentrating on the S7 
module.
            >
            >            What do you think?
            >
            >            Chris
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            
        
        
    
    

Reply via email to