Well for Kafka too the old version had one huge string or a url to read an 
external configuration.
I really disliked this and therefore completely rewrote the config to utilize 
Kafka Connect's internal configuration auditing facilities.

Chris

Am 08.10.19, 12:51 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <[email protected]>:

    Hey Chris,
    
    of Camel, you mean?
    
    Julian
    
    Am 08.10.19, 12:44 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>:
    
        That was what many modules for Kafka seem to do, but I strongly 
disliked that option as it totally avoids the internal mechanisms of the 
framework.
        
        Chris
        
        Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
        
        ________________________________
        From: Julian Feinauer <[email protected]>
        Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 12:33:53 PM
        To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: Camel integration for Scraper
        
        Another idea could be to point it tot he (external) resource which is 
our current yml like used here: 
https://camel.apache.org/components/latest/json-validator-component.html
        
        J
        
        Am 08.10.19, 12:29 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" 
<[email protected]>:
        
            Hi all,
        
            I know that we have a Camel Component but as most of us agree its 
of limited use to scrape only one value.
            Thus, other integrations (like ES and Kafka, AFAIR) use the 
(Triggered)Scraper as basis of their integration.
            I suggest to do the same with Camel (this would be really useful 
for us).
            But I don’t want to hack everything into this small connection 
string (ugly!).
            As I found out, there are also other ways to do that, e.g. for the 
Camel Avro integration: 
https://camel.apache.org/components/latest/avro-dataformat.html
        
            This would be my preffered way to go.
            Any Ideas or objections for that approach?
        
            Julian
        
        
        
    
    

Reply via email to