Hi Matthias,

On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 14:12 +0000, Strljic, Matthias Milan wrote:
> Ok, then i will include the typical URI style for GET-parameters like
> u and Chris suggests.

So are you going to implement it? We need this fix so I can help in the
implementation of it or in the testing.

Cheers!

-- Alvaro

> Perhaps there I try to hard to stick to the domain URL (if there is
> sometimes one 😃 )
> 
> Greetings Matthias
> Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.
> 
> Universität Stuttgart
> Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und
> Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW)
> 
> Seidenstraße 36
> 70174 Stuttgart
> GERMANY
> 
> Tel: +49 711 685-84530
> Fax: +49 711 685-74530
> 
> E-Mail: [email protected]
> Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 
> Gesendet: Monday, December 2, 2019 1:42 PM
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [jira] [Created] (PLC4X-157) OPC-UA: Disable by config
> endpoint discovery
> 
> Hi,
> 
> thanks fort he fast reply Matthias.
> I agree with what Matthias says... I highly suggest the Camel
> Parameter Syntax (basically valid URI's).
> And yes, probably the subtype approach makes sense (this is
> consistent with having the physical transport layer also there for
> protocols that support multiple ones).
> 
> Julian
> 
> Am 02.12.19, 13:31 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan" <
> [email protected]>:
> 
>     Hi all,
>     
>     For this I have a question: How should we deal with this
> consistently in the project?
>     
>     The Camel discussion about parameters/annotation is not over yet
> (?) and I want to avoid parameters in the URL that are not part of
> the domain model of the protocol.
>     So I would solve it first as a new connection subtype.
> "opcua:tcp-ndiscover://145.............".
>     But on the other hand this only makes sense if this is a real
> exception and would else explode in number by defined subtypes.
>     
>     So what do you think?
>     
>     Greeting
>     Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.
>     
>     Universität Stuttgart
>     Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und
> Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW)
>     
>     Seidenstraße 36
>     70174 Stuttgart
>     GERMANY
>     
>     Tel: +49 711 685-84530
>     Fax: +49 711 685-74530
>     
>     E-Mail: [email protected]
>     Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de
>     
>     -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>     Von: Alvaro del Castillo (Jira) <[email protected]> 
>     Gesendet: Friday, November 29, 2019 5:21 PM
>     An: [email protected]
>     Betreff: [jira] [Created] (PLC4X-157) OPC-UA: Disable by config
> endpoint discovery
>     
>     Alvaro del Castillo created PLC4X-157:
>     -----------------------------------------
>     
>                  Summary: OPC-UA: Disable by config endpoint
> discovery
>                      Key: PLC4X-157
>                      URL: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-157
>                  Project: Apache PLC4X
>               Issue Type: Improvement
>               Components: Driver-OPC-UA
>                 Reporter: Alvaro del Castillo
>     
>     
>     Some real world devices like the [
> https://iqunet.com/server-and-data/] includes as the OPC-UA server
> the FreeOPCUA server running inside a docker. When you discover the
> endpoints, the IPs advertised are the internal ones in the docker
> container, so you can not access these endpoint from the network.
>     
>     It is an issue in the device, but for those cases, just using
> directly the public IP in which the OPC-UA server is listening as the
> endpoint is the only solution.
>     
>     For PLC4x to work in those cases, a config option must be
> available to disable the endpoint discovering and just connect to the
> endpoint build with the public IP.
>     
>      
>     
>     
>     
>     --
>     This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
>     (v8.3.4#803005)
>     
> 

Reply via email to