Don't think we need a vote here ... I think we also discussed the matter one or
two times before and no one objected.
So I'd say as soon as Justin says we're ok with the ASF rules, I think we
should add it and then also do some social media initiative asking people to
give back by getting listed.
What do you think?
Chris
Am 26.05.20, 09:18 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
Hi,
yes. Just wanted to add my point here : )
But of course some feedback is very welcome about best practices.
Perhaps we could even hold a formal vote to give it the necessary attention
on the list?
Julian
Am 26.05.20, 09:16 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
Hi Julian,
I like the name "adopters" ... sounds better than "users" especially if
it's on the "users" part of the website.
I would like some feedback from some other ASF folks as in the past
they have brought up concerns and I would prefer to hear if they are ok with
this.
Chris
Am 26.05.20, 09:07 schrieb "Julian Feinauer"
<j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
Hi Chris,
thanks for tackling this.
I really like it and in fact I woul dprobably place it even more
prominent.
I like how eclipse IoT Working Group did it:
https://iot.eclipse.org/adopters/
I see no reason why this would not comply with ASF policy.
Julian
Am 25.05.20, 21:43 schrieb "Christofer Dutz"
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
Hi all,
I think we discussed this multiple times but never actually
continued. So I took the liberty of adding a new page to our website:
https://plc4x.apache.org/users/users.html
However this page isn’t linked in the navigation as I want to
discuss this first.
It’s the plan to allow any company to be listed there. The
mechanism on how to get added is by providing a PR. This way we have someone
who is in git-blame and which we can say is responsible for having a company
added.
I updated all links to be “nofollow” links and to open new
browser tabs.
Would such a page be in-line with the ASF policies?
Chris
