Yupiii !!!

good news !!!

Regards,
S.


On 25/08/2020 15:45, Adam Rossi wrote:
> Juilan,
>
> My apologies - your fix did indeed work. The issue is that
> PooledPlcDriverManager does not seem to be calling the close method on the
> connection. Switching back to PlcDriverManager from PooledPlcDriverManager
> results in your new log comments showing up in the log, and more
> importantly no more leaks of the nioEventLoopGroup threads. I have tested
> the code in a loop for an hour or so and it is working perfectly.
>
> The PooledPlcDriverManager seems to intercept the close method on the
> plcConnection (lines 125 - 130):
>
>             if ("close".equals(method.getName())) {
>                 LOGGER.debug("close called on {}", plcConnection);
>                 proxyInvalidated.set(true);
>                 keyedObjectPool.returnObject(poolKey, plcConnection);
>                 return null;
>             } else {
>
> Which makes sense as it is trying to keep active connections pooled.
> However, when this connection is again retrieved from the pool it seems the
> plcConnection connects again and creates an additional nioEventLoopGroup
> thread, which is never closed.
>
> I am new to working with this project and Jira. It seems to me that I
> should close the issue I just created as your fix does indeed correct the
> original issue, and perhaps open another issue on PooledPlcDriverManager
> for this thread leak?
>
> Regards, Adam
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:39 AM Julian Feinauer <
> j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> short feedback. I looked into the code and indeed it seems that we had a
>> bug there which could lead tot he socket leak you described.
>> I pushed a fix in the branch:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/bugfix/close-eventloop-after-channel
>>
>> Would you mind taking a look and testing this with your code @Adam Rossi?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Juliasn
>>
>> Am 24.08.20, 08:26 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <
>> j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
>>
>>     Perhaps, some related questions:
>>
>>     - You are using Linux for your Tests?
>>     - Do you close all Connections properly?
>>     Normally the `PlcConnection.close()` method should close the EventLoop.
>>
>>     Julian
>>
>>     Am 24.08.20, 08:23 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <
>> j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
>>
>>         Hi Adam,
>>
>>         I will have a look today!
>>
>>         Do we have a Jira Issue for it already?
>>
>>         Julian
>>
>>         Am 24.08.20, 07:38 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <
>> christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
>>
>>             Hi Adam,
>>
>>             of course that's unfortunate ... also I will not be able to
>> address this issue soon as I have to work on the tasks of my research
>> project.
>>             I have one more month to work on this and I'm months behind
>> schedule because I have been doing free support way too much lately.
>>
>>             I really hope Julian will be able to help ... he's way more
>> into the details of Netty than I am (cause he's got the book ;-) )
>>
>>             So Julian? ... it would be super awesome if you could take on
>> this issue.
>>
>>             Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>             Am 24.08.20, 00:17 schrieb "Adam Rossi" <ac.ro...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>                 Thanks, I did test with 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT and see the same
>> behavior. In every
>>                 plcConnection a nioEventLoopGroup thread is created and
>> does not ever seem
>>                 to be destroyed.
>>
>>                 I wish I understood the io.netty.channel.EventLoopGroup
>> class better to be
>>                 more helpful here. Would an example program that
>> reproduces this thread
>>                 leak be useful?
>>
>>                 jconsole shows the thread data as:
>>
>>                 Name: nioEventLoopGroup-19-1
>>                 State: RUNNABLE
>>                 Total blocked: 0  Total waited: 0
>>
>>                 Stack trace:
>>                 java.base@13.0.2/sun.nio.ch.EPoll.wait(Native Method)
>>                 java.base@13.0.2
>>
>> /sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:120)
>>                 java.base@13.0.2
>>
>> /sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:124)
>>                    - locked
>> io.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySet@1838f97
>>                    - locked sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl@1f49287
>>                 java.base@13.0.2/sun.nio.ch
>> .SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:141)
>>
>> app//io.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.select(SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.java:68)
>>
>> app//io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.select(NioEventLoop.java:803)
>>
>> app//io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:457)
>>
>> app//io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:989)
>>
>> app//io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
>>
>> app//io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
>>                 java.base@13.0.2/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:830)
>>
>>
>>                 Regards, Adam
>>
>>                 On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Christofer Dutz <
>> christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
>>                 wrote:
>>
>>                 > Hi Adam,
>>                 >
>>                 > the Apache SNAPSHOT repo is at:
>>                 >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots
>>                 >
>>                 > Adding this to your pom should help:
>>                 >
>>                 >   <!-- Make Snapshots of Apache projects available -->
>>                 >   <repositories>
>>                 >     <repository>
>>                 >       <id>apache-snapshots</id>
>>                 >       <url>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots
>>                 > </url>
>>                 >       <releases>
>>                 >         <enabled>false</enabled>
>>                 >       </releases>
>>                 >       <snapshots>
>>                 >         <enabled>true</enabled>
>>                 >       </snapshots>
>>                 >     </repository>
>>                 >   </repositories>
>>                 >
>>                 >   <!-- Make Snapshots of Apache plugins available -->
>>                 >   <pluginRepositories>
>>                 >     <pluginRepository>
>>                 >       <id>apache-snapshots</id>
>>                 >       <url>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots
>>                 > </url>
>>                 >       <releases>
>>                 >         <enabled>false</enabled>
>>                 >       </releases>
>>                 >       <snapshots>
>>                 >         <enabled>true</enabled>
>>                 >       </snapshots>
>>                 >     </pluginRepository>
>>                 >   </pluginRepositories>
>>                 >
>>                 > Chris
>>                 > Am 23.08.20, 18:56 schrieb "Adam Rossi" <
>> ac.ro...@gmail.com>:
>>                 >
>>                 >     Sure thing. Is 0.8.0-snapshot hosted anywhere or is
>> that something
>>                 > that needs to be built? Regards Adam
>>                 >
>>                 >     > On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:31 PM, Christofer Dutz <
>>                 > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     > Hmm ...
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     > Could you possibly give 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT a try? ....
>> or 0.6.x? ...
>>                 > 0.7.0 was the first of the new generation drivers. We're
>> maintaining the
>>                 > 0.6 branch and working hard on making the new generation
>> drivers 100%
>>                 > production ready.
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     > Chris
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     > Am 23.08.20, 18:06 schrieb "Adam Rossi" <
>> ac.ro...@gmail.com>:
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     >    This is the latest 0.7.0 release from Maven.
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     >    Regards Adam
>>                 >     >
>>                 >     >> On Aug 23, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Christofer Dutz <
>>                 > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >> Hi Adam,
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >> which version of PLC4X are you using? I know we
>> had similar reports
>>                 > some time ago, but had thought we had fixed them
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >> Chris
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >> Am 23.08.20, 16:40 schrieb "Adam Rossi" <
>> ac.ro...@gmail.com>:
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>   Howdy. I am seeing a persistent thread being
>> created for every
>>                 >     >>   plcConnection connect which looks like the
>> following:
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>   Name: nioEventLoopGroup-11-1
>>                 >     >>   State: RUNNABLE
>>                 >     >>   Total blocked: 0  Total waited: 0
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>   Stack trace:
>>                 >     >>   java.base@13.0.2/sun.nio.ch.EPoll.wait(Native
>> Method)
>>                 >     >>   java.base@13.0.2
>>                 >     >>
>>  /sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:120)
>>                 >     >>   java.base@13.0.2
>>                 >     >>
>>  /sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:124)
>>                 >     >>      - locked
>> io.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySet@f6df6b
>>                 >     >>      - locked sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl@7ffc19
>>                 >     >>   java.base@13.0.2/sun.nio.ch
>>                 > .SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:141)
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >
>> app//io.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.select(SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.java:68)
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >
>> app//io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.select(NioEventLoop.java:803)
>>                 >     >>
>>  app//io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:457)
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >
>> app//io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:989)
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >
>> app//io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >
>> app//io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
>>                 >     >>   java.base@13.0.2
>> /java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:830)
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>   This happens both when creating a connection
>> directly or when
>>                 > using the
>>                 >     >>   plc4x connection pool.
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>   In both cases I am obtaining the connection,
>> reading some modbus
>>                 > values,
>>                 >     >>   and then closing the connection. From the
>> plcConnection metadata
>>                 > the
>>                 >     >>   connection type I am using is:
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>
>>  org.apache.plc4x.java.spi.connection.DefaultNettyPlcConnection
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>   Over time thousands of these nioEventLoopGroup
>> threads are
>>                 > created and I
>>                 >     >>   experience an OutOfMemory error in my program.
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>   Has anyone experienced this problem? Is there a
>> way to force
>>                 > these threads
>>                 >     >>   to close, timeout, or to specify the total
>> thread limit?
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >>   Thanks and Regards, Adam
>>                 >     >>
>>                 >     >
>>                 >
>>                 >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to