Hi Lukasz, It would be pretty simple to extend the code generation to make the virtual fields available in the parser ... I just didn't do it as I then didn't see the need. Should be extremely simple to implement. (Sort of just a copy+paste of the pojo template)
You can use type-arguments in typeSwitches ... just have a look at the modbus mspec. What do you mean with "undeclared discriminators"? Chris Am 26.08.20, 01:22 schrieb "Łukasz Dywicki" <[email protected]>: I been trying to write new mspecs and I found that discriminator handling is quite limiting in current form. For example it is possible to declare a type argument, but it is not possible to use it as a divider. It is also not possible to use a virtual or manual field as a discriminator which could very well be source for type information. I am aware that virtual field is computed at runtime with given expression. I am not entirely sure of all implications for changing the handling. Currently discriminator is a simple field which gets registered in discriminator set. What do you think about making a `discriminator` rather an modifier which could be placed for type arguments and also in other places? At the moment any use of [typeSwitch] with undeclared discriminator causes null pointers in freemarker templates and failure. Cheers, Łukasz
