shasum works for me. I think I got gshasum512 from the site.
Ok, I have an possible issue: The License has the information about mvnw stuff’s inclusion. As far as I understand it, this belongs in the NOTICE, not the LICENSE. > On Dec 14, 2020, at 01:50, Lukas Ott <[email protected]> wrote: > > This happens in my terminal: > $gpg --verify apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.asc > apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip > gpg: Signatur vom So 13 Dez 2020 17:39:46 CET > gpg: mittels RSA-Schlüssel > B6AC3BF1A0F08554144EEC56027975C99CBA22C7 > gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Lukas Ott <[email protected]>" [ultimativ] > $ shasum -a512 apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip > 7a906395077f34cbb6c0d66241d17784c9ad7077d8533553fee7cd2d2cae0e8877933969fe3424f29f32af2094af952067ca3887adf178fe08e5f012f77a412f > apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip > > Am Mo., 14. Dez. 2020 um 04:26 Uhr schrieb Otto Fowler < > [email protected]>: > >> gsha512sum -c apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512 >> gsha512sum: apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512: >> no properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found >> >> anyone seeing this? >> >>> On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:53, Lukas Ott <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread. >>> >>> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of >> votes. >>> >>> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and >>> then take the details to this thread. >> >>
