Hello, I agree with Lukasz proposal to include OSGi in the discussion as the runtime.
+1 Specifically, it would be interesting to evaluate the sections 103.- Device Access Specification. 141.- Device Abstraction layer Specification. Kind regards, El jue, 21 mar 2024 a las 14:33, Łukasz Dywicki (<l...@code-house.org>) escribió: > I can add one more: > > - Support for OSGi as a potential project runtime. > > It is a technology which is still popular for various applications > running on the edge. > @Cesar, I know you use it, pulling you into thread so you can also share > your point in this regard. > > I do maintain a separate repository [1] with hand written karaf feature > sets. I do so to avoid large duplication of dependencies between > drivers, as generated feature sets are quite dumb. > I did it initially to make 0.6 and 0.8 release work with openHAB, after > seeing recent updates from 0.11 release I think we have most of stuff in > place to make it work. > One missing concept is a classloader propagation so whole thing would > work without Aries Spifly in other down stream projects, i.e. openems. > > Cheers, > Łukasz > > -- > [1] https://github.com/ConnectorIO/plc4x-extras/ > > On 21.03.2024 14:39, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Possibly worth adding: > > - Refactor the OPC-UA test-suite to run as Integration-Test in the build > and to rely on a Milo server started in the pre-integration-test phase and > which is stopped in the post-integration-test-phase. > > > > Von: Lukas Ott <ott.lukas...@gmail.com> > > Datum: Montag, 18. März 2024 um 11:51 > > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <dev@plc4x.apache.org> > > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] What do we want to look into/talk about on the > Meetup/Workshop? > > Mine are much simpler: > > - Merge my pull request > > * https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/1419 should be 5-10 minutes > with > > Sebastian. > > - Go through PLC4PY with Ben and get things running on my side > > * Add Pip Package to https://pypi.org/ including release integration > etc. > > * What is missing for PLC4Py to get out of the sandbox? > > * Find little tasks where I can start and not overwhelmed as one > of > > the rare-non developers in that project. > > - Look into what you (Chris) did with ReactJS on the UI branch and get > that > > running > > > > For the rest I am giving a +1 for your points. > > > > Lukas > > > > Am Mo., 18. März 2024 um 11:17 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < > > christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > > > >> Here some things I have on my mind: > >> > >> > >> * Road to 1.0.0 (What’s still missing?) > >> * Generating larger portions of the code (Mesasages & > Request+Response) > >> * Missing features: > >> * Optimizer Framework (Optimize requests, by rewriting them) > >> * Subscription Emulation (General purpose component, that uses > the > >> READ api to simulare subscriptions) > >> * New/Advanced Scraper (Rewrite of the Scraper, that allows > things > >> like “read, triggered by subscription”) > >> * How can we distribute the workload a bit better? > >> * How can we grow the community? > >> > >> Chris > >> > > > -- *CEOS Automatización, C.A.* *GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,* *FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García* *Cel: +58 414-760.98.95* *Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080* *Email: support.aan.automat...@siemens.com <support.aan.automat...@siemens.com>*
