Hello Chris,
Having commits "out of order" in terms of time or messages/references is
not an issue for git. Its what makes this SCM great for distributed
development!
At the same time, I believe that comments about what you do with plc4j
in context of your company and its (closed source) product are not valid
for this mailing list. I again urge you to abstain from advertising
your company within public communications towards apache-owned
communication channels. As I already mentioned earlier in theasf slack
(July 24th):
> If you want to advertise these (features), please go ahead with
> supplier page and direct to your own product page of your company
Kind regards,
Łukasz Dywicki
On 8/20/26 19:33, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Hi all,
If you’re watching the commits today and in the next few days … don’t be
surprised that you will most probably not be seeing a pattern. I will be
jumping from A to B, then to C and back to A.
As some of you know, last year I rewrote PLC4J from scratch as my commercial
offering. I am intentionally keeping some major functionality closed source.
However, there’s loads of improvements and little corrections that are
absolutely worth back-porting.
That’s what I’m currently working on.
Chris
