Hi Chris, I agree with your idea for the presentation. I think it’s a good idea to even define the quality of what’s contributed to the project’s code. It would be good if anyone who wants to contribute could provide (at least) a simple document explaining what they want to contribute and why, whether they found an area for improvement in the code, and what their potential contribution would be—especially given what you mentioned: the use of AI has made it all too easy for many people to churn out code without thinking it through, apparently causing vulnerabilities. For my part, I support your decision and am happy to help out however I can. Best regards, @lerb.
El sáb, 29 ago. 2026, 5:57 a. m., Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> escribió: > Hi all, > > As you might have seen we’re getting more and more random PRs generated by > assuringly AI generated drive-by contributors only wanting to gain > „reputation“ by showing off their „hard work“. > > I would propose to update our contribution guidelines, that people > submitting PRs also are required to show up on the dev list and introduce > themselves and tell us about who they are and why they want to contribute. > > If someone doesn’t do that I would like to start simply pulling in legit > changes without „awarding“ them a countable contribution. > > If I hear no objections, I’ll update our web content accordingly when > doing the updates prior to the release next week. > > > Chris >
