Hi Yegor,
I had to ask. I've seen a Jakarta beta do it differently, but we are a
huge project compared to that.
So, OK. Let's make sure that we get these issues resolved next week -
then at least the nightly builds will have all the details properly
marked.
(1) A really, really proper NOTICE and LICENSE.
(2) All copyright statements in the project properly checked and
adjusted.
(3) All source files with the proper license statement in them.
Do we have any other copyrights in the code other than one we had the
author re-license?
./resources/scratchpad/org/apache/poi/hdgf/chunks_parse_cmds.tbl
3:# Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Valek Filippov ([email protected])
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 20, 2009, at 2:34 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
RAT has a way to do it. Take a look at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/rat/rat-core/src/main/java/org/apache/rat/analysis/license/ApacheSoftwareLicense20.java
It only does a minimal check. A full check could be done.
I did a find/grep search on copyright.
There are a few files that show copyright for The POI Project and
not the ASF. These are mostly documentation files. They could be
quickly fixed as well.
Should we repackage this release with these license and copyright
fixes along with a better NOTICE?
I don't think we should re-package this release as it will require
another round of evaluation / voting. Jukka is going to propose an
improved version of the LICENCE but it will be not earlier than
weekend. Current issues are OK for a beta and I would rather not
delay this release because of them.
Yegor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
