+1 to delete

-----Original Message-----
From: Yegor Kozlov [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 6:06 AM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: Re: Please remove my file from your svn

Do we have a consensus to delete this file from svn ?

If there are no any other opinions I will do so within 24 hours.

Yegor
(with POI PMC chair hat on)



On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
> I am on both the Apache POI and the Apache OpenOffice PMC. Action will be
> taken.
>
> As a producer of PPT and PPTX files along with other Office documents we
> have always done our best to try to consume documents created by any
> producer including OpenOffice.org. I wonder if a PPT produced by the
> current Apache OpenOffice 4 would show this same solved bug.
>
> No doubt a POI developer will remove this test case very soon and it will
> no longer be in our svn and will not be in our next release. True mirrors
> will catch up.
>
> (Have you looked at Apache Solr, Mahout, or Hadoop? You quote a paper from
> Doug Cutting an inventor of Hadoop, which was named after his child's top
> elephant.)
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On Dec 12, 2013, at 7:28 PM, Nirk Niggler wrote:
>
> > Chris:
> >
> > If you read my reply, you would see that I actually agree with you.  If
> > Raiko cannot certify that the file can be distributed under the same
> > license terms as Apache POI, the file should be removed.
> >
> > I asked for clarification because IP issues in academia are rarely
> > clear-cut. For example, if you received a scholarship of any sort (or
> were
> > part of a funded graduate program), exception 5.1.3 would actually apply
> > unless you obtained a written statement as described in section 5.4 (and
> > this would be an exercise in futility)
> >
> > That being said, if you are serious about going down this route, I would
> > also suggest suggest going after others who are hosting the file, such as
> > docstoc
> >
> http://www.docstoc.com/docs/24138033/Tagging-with-Hidden-Markov-Models(shared
> > by rbb85147
> > http://www.docstoc.com/profile/rbb85147) and going after others that
> have
> > publicly available mirrors of POI.  A quick search on github reveals a
> few
> > mirrors, including:
> >
> > -
> >
> https://github.com/orione/POI/blob/master/test-data/slideshow/PictureLengthZero.ppt
> > -
> >
> https://github.com/samchuang/zkpoi/blob/master/test-data/slideshow/PictureLengthZero.ppt
> > -
> >
> https://github.com/tay204/VendorInterface/blob/master/poi-3.9/test-data/slideshow/PictureLengthZero.ppt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Chris Demwell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Nirk,
> >>
> >> I would like to reiterate that this file is probably of negative value
> to
> >> you: I have mentioned this is *not a Microsoft Office file* and
> therefore
> >> seems unlikely to be a good test case for your project.
> >>
> >> I am disappointed that I have to go into this: regardless of any terms
> of
> >> ownership between SFU and myself, the ASF and the POI project are not
> party
> >> to those terms. In any case, as it happens I'm aware of the terms from
> SFU
> >> and sought such clarification immediately upon enrolment. This content
> was
> >> a talk I gave as part of a special topics discussion course and not as
> >> "homework". The terms can be seen at
> >> http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/research/r30-03.html - specifically,
> >> section 5.1 applies:
> >>
> >> "5.1 Although the University has the right to require assignment of an
> >> interest in IP created by a University Member through the use of its
> >> resources, the full ownership of IP and all rights pertaining to
> ownership
> >> are vested in the Creator, unless the Creator has entered into an
> agreement
> >> with the University to the contrary."
> >>
> >> There are several exceptions listed, none of which apply to this file.
> This
> >> is my IP, and more importantly it is not yours, nor Raiko's, nor do you
> >> have license from SFU. Other than that I think we agree about the legal
> >> situation. The waters are not muddy, you do not have license to this
> file.
> >>
> >> Please remove it from your svn history or inform me that you don't
> intend
> >> to do so.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Nirk Niggler <[email protected]
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Chris:
> >>>
> >>> A cursory google search reveals that this was part of a class project
> and
> >>> is publicly available at
> >>> http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~anoop/courses/CMPT-882-Fall-2002/chris.ppt,
> which
> >>> somewhat muddies the waters (you'd have to get clarification from your
> >>> school regarding the IP rights associated with class homework and
> >> projects).
> >>>
> >>> Eric:
> >>>
> >>> While there is no obvious confidential information in the document, the
> >>> original contributor Raiko Eckstein violated the terms of the bugzilla
> <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/createaccount.cgi>
> >>>
> >>>> "Certify that any object code, source code, patch, documentation, etc.
> >>> that you may supply to an Apache project can be redistributed under the
> >>> same license terms and conditions as the project itself."
> >>>
> >>> That alone should be grounds for removal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Eric Peters <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I have nothing to do with the POI Apache project, other than being a
> >> user,
> >>>> never contributed, nor have anything to associate other than being on
> >> this
> >>>> mailing list - but I'd say chill the f*** out.
> >>>>
> >>>> The relative harms for the debug test file is probably negligible, and
> >> in
> >>>> the grand scheme of things, its probably not using your IP at all,
> >> rather
> >>>> the factual bytes that were generated by OpenOffice, or usable under
> US
> >>>> Fair Use, as long as the  (which is the same/similar file type to MS
> >>>> Powerpoint, which is sort of the point of the example file)
> >>>>
> >>>> Your copyright standpoint on the file, its feasible to recreate the
> PPT
> >> to
> >>>> re-illustrate the failed code, that might have some similarities to
> your
> >>>> original file but not be a byte-by-byte representation of the code,
> and
> >> it
> >>>> wouldn't pass a copyright muster (assuming you even filed for
> copyright
> >>>> protections)
> >>>>
> >>>> Take a deep breath, and find something productive to do.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Eric
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Chris Demwell <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In 2007, someone uploaded my IP to your bug tracker in
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41357 - that
> >> person
> >>>> did
> >>>>> not have license to use my IP, and therefore you also do not. You
> >>>> continue
> >>>>> to host that file in your svn:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/test-data/slideshow/PictureLengthZero.ppt-
> >>>>> please remove it from your svn history.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would also point out that someone sending you a file to help you
> >>>> solve a
> >>>>> bug does not automatically or implicitly grant the legal right to use
> >>>> the
> >>>>> file for any other purpose, store, and certainly not republish the
> >> file.
> >>>>> You are likely illegally republishing other files as part of the test
> >>>>> directory in your svn and I humbly suggest that your only course of
> >>>> action
> >>>>> is to remove those files that you do not explicitly know that you are
> >>>>> licensed to redistribute.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Much more collegially, that PPT was an export from OpenOffice.org
> (ie,
> >>>> not
> >>>>> created by MS Powerpoint) and therefore may not be an appropriate
> test
> >>>> file
> >>>>> for your project. I'm sorry if this has caused you any consternation
> >> in
> >>>>> designing or maintaining your project. Thanks for your contributions
> >> to
> >>>>> open source software - while I don't use POI I still have great
> >> respect
> >>>> for
> >>>>> your work.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Chris Demwell
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to