Hi, Oh, sorry for the false alarm, this seems to be a problem with my compare-tool (Beyond Compare), it displays two test-documents as being contained on top-level of the src-tar.gz. When extracting via other tools I don't see those.
So I am +1 here! However I saw that we do actually break some stuff with all the Enum-rework, e.g. the following will not work any more out of the box: switch (cell.getCellType()) { case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC: Unfortunately a switch on teh CellType is quite common, so we need to explain this in the release notes and I think we should be a bit more conservative with all those refactorings/deprecations in the future to not cause too much change in those places! Dominik. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:10 AM, David North <dno...@apache.org> wrote: > Your image didn't come through. I see the following inside the poi-3.15 > directory of poi-src-3.15-20160828.zip: > > legal > osgi > sonar > src > test-data > build.xml > forrest.properties > KEYS > LICENSE > NOTICE > patch.xml > > Which are unwanted? This seems to match the src packages in the last beta. > > Thanks, > David > > On 22/08/16 07:47, Dominik Stadler wrote: > > Sorry, me again, > > > > Unfortunately there are still some unwanted artifacts in the > > src-package, can you remove those as well? > > > > > > Inline image 1 > > > > While not blocking the release, but the Java version used for the build > > seems to be "1.6.0_34", which is a bit outdated, latest (and last) > > version of Java 6 is patchlevel 45, would look better to use this one to > > build releases. > > > > Dominik. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:49 AM, David North <dno...@apache.org > > <mailto:dno...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > Vote begins now and ends at 11:55 BST 2016-08-23 > > > > Artifacts are here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/ > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/> > > > > Usual checks required (does it work? does the distribution look > right?), > > only more so as this is an RC for a non-beta release. > > > > +1 from me. > > > > As those of you watching the commits may have seen, I can't get the > svn > > commits from ant to work on either of my machines (Debian stable or > > Fedora 22) - I thought I'd fixed it by upgrading to svn 1.9, but > > seemingly not. I've therefore replaced them with "exec" tasks calling > > the SVN command line client. This needs further investigation. > > > > I also had to manually strip out the spurious "trunk" directory from > the > > src zip/tar, so that's another fix needed somewhere in the build > > scripts. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > David North | www.dnorth.net <http://www.dnorth.net> > > > > > > -- > David North - Committer and PMC Member, Apache POI > https://home.apache.org/~dnorth/ > >