Sorry, you're quite right - I am unable to get this done at the moment - somebody else, please take over if you can.
Thanks, David On 05/09/16 21:16, Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi, > > David, please let someone else step in if you cannot run the next > release-build yourselves anytime soon. > > Dominik. > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:21 PM, David North <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was going to go ahead with RC2 real soon now - will do tomorrow PM >> unless told otherwise. >> >> David >> >> On 29/08/16 17:23, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: >>> I won't have time to make any progress (or even to respond to >> you...sorry!) on 60044 until the end of the week... :( >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 12:32 PM >>> To: POI Developers List <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1) >>> >>> In the interest of getting this release out not too far after Aug 2016 >> and unfreezing the trunk, are we waiting for the closure of any particular >> bugs, such as bug 60044 [1], before building RC2? >>> >>> [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60044 >>> >>> On Aug 22, 2016 12:33, "Javen O'Neal" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> While we're discussing enums backwards compatibility, are there any >>>> other changes as part of >>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836 >>>> that we absolutely cannot break backwards compatibility and blocks 3.16? >>>> >>>> 58190 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190>: >>>> PictureType (XSLF, scratchpad?) >>>> >>>> 58636 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58636>: >>>> AnchorType (for drawings and comments, SS Common) >>>> >>>> 58671 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58671>: >>>> MissingCellPolicy (class->enum, SS Common) >>>> >>>> 59264 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59264>: >>>> BorderStyle (SS Common) >>>> >>>> 59790 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59790>: >>>> FormulaType (internal, SS Common) >>>> >>>> ** 59791 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59791>: >>>> CellType (SS Common) >>>> >>>> 59833 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833>: >>>> FillPatternType (for cell background texture, SS Common) >>>> >>>> 59837 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59837>: >>>> HorizontalAlignment and VerticalAlignment (cell style alignment for SS >>>> Common) >>>> >>>> 59873 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59873>: >>>> HyperlinkType (Common SS, SL) >>>> >>>> On Aug 22, 2016 11:27, "Javen O'Neal" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nick, could you republish the Javadocs, please? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Javen O'Neal <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>> switch (cell.getCellType()) { >>>>>>> case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have fixed the backwards compatibility problem in r1757235. See >>>>>> [1] for more info. >>>>>> >>>>>> My vote is -1. We should rebuild the RC with r1757235. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have added this test [2] to prove that the old way of working >>>>>> with cell types works without modification alongside the new way. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59791#c10 >>>>>> [2] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/src/testcases/org/ap >>>>> ache/poi/ss/usermodel/BaseTestCell.java?r1=1757235&r2=175723 >>>>> 4&pathrev=1757235 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Dominik Stadler < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, sorry for the false alarm, this seems to be a problem with my >>>>>>> compare-tool (Beyond Compare), it displays two test-documents as >>>>>>> being contained on top-level of the src-tar.gz. When extracting >>>>>>> via other >>>>> tools I >>>>>>> don't see those. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I am +1 here! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However I saw that we do actually break some stuff with all the >>>>>>> Enum-rework, e.g. the following will not work any more out of the >> box: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> switch (cell.getCellType()) { >>>>>>> case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unfortunately a switch on teh CellType is quite common, so we need >>>>>>> to explain this in the release notes and I think we should be a >>>>>>> bit more conservative with all those refactorings/deprecations in >>>>>>> the future to >>>>> not >>>>>>> cause too much change in those places! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dominik. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:10 AM, David North <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your image didn't come through. I see the following inside the >>>>> poi-3.15 >>>>>>>> directory of poi-src-3.15-20160828.zip: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> legal >>>>>>>> osgi >>>>>>>> sonar >>>>>>>> src >>>>>>>> test-data >>>>>>>> build.xml >>>>>>>> forrest.properties >>>>>>>> KEYS >>>>>>>> LICENSE >>>>>>>> NOTICE >>>>>>>> patch.xml >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which are unwanted? This seems to match the src packages in the >>>>>>>> last >>>>> beta. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 22/08/16 07:47, Dominik Stadler wrote: >>>>>>>>> Sorry, me again, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Unfortunately there are still some unwanted artifacts in the >>>>>>>>> src-package, can you remove those as well? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Inline image 1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> While not blocking the release, but the Java version used for >>>>>>>>> the >>>>> build >>>>>>>>> seems to be "1.6.0_34", which is a bit outdated, latest (and >>>>>>>>> last) version of Java 6 is patchlevel 45, would look better to >>>>>>>>> use this >>>>> one to >>>>>>>>> build releases. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dominik. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:49 AM, David North >>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vote begins now and ends at 11:55 BST 2016-08-23 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts are here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/ >>>>>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Usual checks required (does it work? does the distribution >>>>>>>>> look >>>>>>>> right?), >>>>>>>>> only more so as this is an RC for a non-beta release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 from me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As those of you watching the commits may have seen, I can't >>>>>>>>> get >>>>> the >>>>>>>> svn >>>>>>>>> commits from ant to work on either of my machines (Debian >>>>> stable or >>>>>>>>> Fedora 22) - I thought I'd fixed it by upgrading to svn 1.9, >> but >>>>>>>>> seemingly not. I've therefore replaced them with "exec" >>>>>>>>> tasks >>>>> calling >>>>>>>>> the SVN command line client. This needs further investigation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I also had to manually strip out the spurious "trunk" >>>>>>>>> directory >>>>> from >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> src zip/tar, so that's another fix needed somewhere in the >> build >>>>>>>>> scripts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> David North | www.dnorth.net <http://www.dnorth.net> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> David North - Committer and PMC Member, Apache POI >>>>>>>> https://home.apache.org/~dnorth/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> -- >> David North | www.dnorth.net >> >> > -- David North - Committer and PMC Member, Apache POI https://home.apache.org/~dnorth/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
