All,
  On TIKA-2058 [1], Luis Filipe Nassif attached a patch for POI that _may_ 
solve a memory leak.  We haven't had a chance to test that it solves the 
problem.  The patch looks reasonable to me (it is very short), but I don't know 
enough about FileBackedDataSource to apply it responsibly.
  If anyone has a chance to look, it would be great to apply this before we 
respin.
  Thank you!

             Best,

                         Tim
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2058 
-----Original Message-----
From: David North [mailto:dtn-...@corefiling.co.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 12:09 PM
To: POI Developers List <dev@poi.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC2)

Thanks - sounds good. I guess I'd better change my +1 to a -1 and try to build 
a fresh RC tomorrow night.

On 13/09/16 17:06, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> I will commit a fix for this today with the goal for backwards 
> compatibility.
> 
> Here's the plan:
> getX() returns int
> getXEnum() returns enum
> setX(int)
> setX(enum)
> 
> I will also take a look at bug 59907 (client anchor enum)
> 
> On Sep 13, 2016 6:58 AM, "David North" <dtn-...@corefiling.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Javen, any thoughts on this one?
>>
>> On 13/09/16 12:14, Dominik Stadler wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I really hate to delay this further, but unfortunately we have a 
>>> similar problem in class CellValue as we tried to fix in Cell in 
>>> RC2, the
>>> getCellType() is now an enum whereas it was an int before, so 
>>> something like the following in user-code does break in POI 3.15:
>>>
>>> CellValue cellValue = checkAndGetCellValue(evaluator, sheet, line);
>>>
>>>     switch (cellValue.getCellType()) {
>>>         case Cell.CELL_TYPE_STRING:
>>>
>>>
>>> I am sorry that I did not see this earlier but this can lead to the 
>>> same incompatibility as we had in Cell before.
>>>
>>> Dominik.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:46 PM, David North <dno...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> My apologies for going AWOL in the middle of the last release 
>>>> attempt. I didn't anticipate that we'd find problems in review 
>>>> twice in a row, and things have been very busy for me at work 
>>>> lately. However, I've now rolled a second RC for 3.15.
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC2/
>>>>
>>>> Areas to review:
>>>>
>>>> * Does it work?
>>>> * Are the sigs and hashes valid?
>>>> * Have the issues with the last RC been fixed?
>>>> * Are the release notes now in good shape?
>>>>
>>>> The vote starts now and ends at 20:55 BST on Tuesday 13 September 2016.
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1.
>>>>
>>>> After this release is done, I'll try and find some time to profile 
>>>> the build & tests - 15 minutes is quite a wait on an SSD (it's 
>>>> possible we might want some multi-threaded options on the tests).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> David North | www.dnorth.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional 
>> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, 
e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Reply via email to