>* I'll take a look at the patch on TIKA-2058, if it's low-risk it can go in
I committed Luis Filipe Nassif's patch last night (BUG 60140).  Please do take 
a look to make sure the change doesn't cause any unforeseen problems.

>> * I could do with input from those who use HSLF about whether to hold up 
>> another RC for the issue below.
> I've already patched the HSLF issue yesterday

Thank you, Andi!


-----Original Message-----
From: David North [mailto:dtn-...@corefiling.co.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 4:16 AM
To: dev@poi.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC2)

OK, current status:

* I'll take a look at the patch on TIKA-2058, if it's low-risk it can go in
* I could do with input from those who use HSLF about whether to hold up 
another RC for the issue below.

I may not have time to roll RC3 tonight; if not I'll do it tomorrow night which 
gives us all the weekend to try it out.

Thanks,
David

On 14/09/16 21:39, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> The HSLF footer text regression is still open.
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2013
> 
> On Sep 14, 2016 12:43 PM, "Dominik Stadler" <dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd also rather keep it as is to not break it multiple times.
>>
>> Dominik.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Javen O'Neal <javenon...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> CellValue#getCellType was changed to return an enum after the 3.14
>> release.
>>> I reverted that signature change in r1760607 (see bug 59791 comment 13).
>>>
>>> For bug 59907, I broke backwards compatibility for ClientAnchor 
>>> (both
>> HSSF
>>> and XSSF) in r1716313 (first appeared in POI 3.14 beta 1 and 
>>> included in POI 3.14 final) without the usual 2 release deprecation 
>>> warning. The question is do I restore the behavior of 3.13 (breaking 
>>> code a second
>> time
>>> for anyone who upgraded their code to 3.14, and a third time 
>>> whenever we retire the int code), or do we leave it as is and ask 
>>> users to upgrade to the enum getter now?
>>>
>>> Looking at the code example from bug 59907 comment 1, the fix for 
>>> them is
>>> simple: delete ".getValue()".
>>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2016 09:06, "Javen O'Neal" <javenon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will commit a fix for this today with the goal for backwards 
>>>> compatibility.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the plan:
>>>> getX() returns int
>>>> getXEnum() returns enum
>>>> setX(int)
>>>> setX(enum)
>>>>
>>>> I will also take a look at bug 59907 (client anchor enum)
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 13, 2016 6:58 AM, "David North" <dtn-...@corefiling.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Javen, any thoughts on this one?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13/09/16 12:14, Dominik Stadler wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really hate to delay this further, but unfortunately we have a
>>> similar
>>>>>> problem in class CellValue as we tried to fix in Cell in RC2, the
>>>>>> getCellType() is now an enum whereas it was an int before, so
>>> something
>>>>>> like the following in user-code does break in POI 3.15:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CellValue cellValue = checkAndGetCellValue(evaluator, sheet, 
>>>>>> line);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     switch (cellValue.getCellType()) {
>>>>>>         case Cell.CELL_TYPE_STRING:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am sorry that I did not see this earlier but this can lead to 
>>>>>> the
>>> same
>>>>>> incompatibility as we had in Cell before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dominik.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:46 PM, David North <dno...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My apologies for going AWOL in the middle of the last release
>>> attempt.
>>>>> I
>>>>>>> didn't anticipate that we'd find problems in review twice in a 
>>>>>>> row,
>>> and
>>>>>>> things have been very busy for me at work lately. However, I've 
>>>>>>> now rolled a second RC for 3.15.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC2/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Areas to review:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Does it work?
>>>>>>> * Are the sigs and hashes valid?
>>>>>>> * Have the issues with the last RC been fixed?
>>>>>>> * Are the release notes now in good shape?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote starts now and ends at 20:55 BST on Tuesday 13 
>>>>>>> September
>>> 2016.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is my +1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After this release is done, I'll try and find some time to 
>>>>>>> profile
>>> the
>>>>>>> build & tests - 15 minutes is quite a wait on an SSD (it's 
>>>>>>> possible
>>> we
>>>>>>> might want some multi-threaded options on the tests).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> David North | www.dnorth.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For 
>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, 
e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Reply via email to