My only minor feedback is I'd prefer we do a first release as 1.0. I think
there is an allergy to 0.1 software in production so I'd rather we just
start at 1.

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 1:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi Dmitri
>
> It makes sense to me.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Le lun. 23 sept. 2024 à 20:01, Dmitri Bourlatchkov
> <dmitri.bourlatch...@dremio.com.invalid> a écrit :
>
> > From my POV, I'd propose to resolve the OAuth token endpoint concern [1]
> > before the initial release.
> >
> > I guess it might be a rather big refactoring, but this issue is already
> > generally accepted as a security concern in the Iceberg community, so I
> > think it would be preferable to resolve it before the first release.
> WDYT?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dmitri.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/12
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 1:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > As we know from experience, that the first release needs some careful
> > > preparation steps, I would like to propose aiming for the Apache
> > > Polaris release by the end of October (after CoC NA).
> > >
> > > I propose to start from 0.1-incubating (currently we are building
> > > 999-SNAPSHOT :) ).
> > > I already created 0.1 milestone on GitHub. We can rename it if needed.
> > >
> > > The preparation steps would be:
> > > - do the triage on the GitHub issues, assigning issues to the 0.1
> > milestone
> > > - check the legal (LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, KEYS, etc). I will
> > > start some new checks/updates on that (as I have some experience :) ).
> > > - check distribution and artifact publication (dist.apache.org,
> > > repository.apache.org, ...)
> > >
> > > I have several PRs in preparation, including the release preparation
> > > related PRs.
> > >
> > > As reminder about the process
> > > (https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html), we need
> > > to do release "internally" to the podling , and then start "again" the
> > > vote on the incubator general mailing list. So it's a "longer" process
> > > comparing to a TLP release.
> > >
> > > What do you think ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to