Hi Folks,

Happy New Year! I hope you all had a wonderful and refreshing break.

Following our previous discussions, we have decided to use separated policy
entities(option 2) for table maintenance. I've outlined the detailed design
here,
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kIiVkFFg9tPa5SH70b9WwzbmclrzH3qWHKfCKXw5lbs/edit?usp=sharing.
It is based on the previous design with a wider scope for policy management.

I’d love to hear your thoughts, feedback, or suggestions, so feel free to
review and share your input.

Yufei


On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 5:43 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
> Thank you all for taking the time to meet! Here’s a summary of our
> discussion:
>
>    1. *Challenges with Storing Policies as Properties (Option 1):*
>       - We identified scalability limitations for access control in this
>       approach.
>    2. *Benefits of Using Separate Policy Entities (Option 2):*
>       - This approach offers a more generic solution with improved access
>       control and better performance.
>       - This approach could apply to a variety of use cases, like column
>       masking.
>       - There are certain agreements on this approach.
>    3. *Other Options Considered:*
>       - Storing policies as Polaris entity properties or using a 1:1
>       mapping of policy entities with catalog/namespace/table entities.
>       - While slightly different from Option 1, these approaches still
>       present notable drawbacks similar to option 1.
>    4. *Option to Delegate Policy Storage to TMS:*
>       - We discussed the possibility of not storing any policies in
>       Polaris, allowing TMS to manage all policies.
>       - However, the proposed approach aims to promote interoperability
>       across engines and systems like TMS, without preventing them from having
>       their own rules or policies.
>
>
> Please let me know if I missed anything or if further clarifications are
> needed.
>
>
>
> Yufei
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 2:37 PM Omar Al-Safi <o...@oalsafi.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Yufei for the flexibility!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Omar
>>
>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, 23:12 Yufei Gu, <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I've rescheduled it to next Monday due to the availability. Sorry for
>> > any inconvenience. FYI, I will not record it as I don't have a
>> > premium google account yet.
>> >
>> > Table maintenance in Polaris
>> > Monday, December 9 · 9:00 – 10:00am
>> > Time zone: America/Los_Angeles
>> > Google Meet joining info
>> > Video call link: https://meet.google.com/dix-cdfm-pve
>> >
>> > Yufei
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 1:15 AM Omar Al-Safi <o...@oalsafi.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thank you Yufei for getting this moving.
>> > >
>> > > Unfortunately tomorrow I won't be able to make it plus I think a
>> couple
>> > of
>> > > guys are at reinvent (JB for example), would it make sense to
>> reschedule
>> > to
>> > > early next week? Or maybe have it recorded.
>> > > As I highlighted in the document, I am feeling embedding the policies
>> > into
>> > > Polaris feels more of TMS concern rather than Polaris concern.
>> Unless, we
>> > > provide a way to have pluggable policies where you can either rely on
>> > > Polaris to store the polices or the pluggable implementation would
>> handle
>> > > how that can be stored, which I think fits well in both worlds.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Omar
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:26 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Sorry the meeting title is misleading, the meeting itself is
>> scheduled
>> > on
>> > > > Dec. 5th. Thanks Anurag for pointing that out.
>> > > >
>> > > > Table maintenance in Polaris
>> > > > Thursday, December 5 · 9:00 – 10:00am
>> > > > Time zone: America/Los_Angeles
>> > > > Google Meet joining info
>> > > > Video call link: https://meet.google.com/dix-cdfm-pve
>> > > >
>> > > > Yufei
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 12:32 PM Anurag Mantripragada
>> > > > <amantriprag...@apple.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Thanks Yufei, I think you meant Thursday, December 5th 9:00am –
>> > 10:00am
>> > > > > (GMT-08).
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Anurag Mantripragada
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > On Dec 3, 2024, at 11:33 AM, Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Folks,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > We’ve made some adjustments to the design, moving from *Option
>> 1*
>> > to
>> > > > > *Option
>> > > > > > 2*:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >   1. *Option 1:* Store maintenance policies in
>> > > catalog/namespace/table
>> > > > > >   properties.
>> > > > > >   2. *Option 2:* Store maintenance policies as separate
>> entities.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The key concern with Option 1 is that the access control model
>> > isn't
>> > > > > > scalable. On the other hand, Option 2 provides greater
>> flexibility,
>> > > > > > improved privilege enforcement, and better overall performance.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I’ve updated the design document with the latest changes, which
>> you
>> > > can
>> > > > > > find here: Updated Design Document
>> > > > > > <
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pd_mzZcfvnUvcH98IbwsIYf4eryet1lQDfclKYx-t-M/edit?usp=sharing
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > .
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > To discuss this design change in detail, I’ll be hosting a
>> session
>> > on
>> > > > > > Thursday. Please find the meeting details below:
>> > > > > > Table maintenance in Polaris @ Thu, Nov 7, 2024 9:00am – 10:00am
>> > > > (GMT-08)
>> > > > > > Thursday, December 5 · 9:00 – 10:00am
>> > > > > > Time zone: America/Los_Angeles
>> > > > > > Google Meet joining info
>> > > > > > Video call link: https://meet.google.com/dix-cdfm-pve
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Feel free to review the updated document ahead of the session.
>> > > Looking
>> > > > > > forward to your thoughts and feedback during the meeting!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Yufei
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:43 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> > > j...@nanthrax.net>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> Hi Yufei
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Not sure we got consensus in all details but the overall
>> picture
>> > is
>> > > ok
>> > > > > for
>> > > > > >> me.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Let’s continue the details definition in the PR.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Thanks !
>> > > > > >> Regards
>> > > > > >> JB
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Le jeu. 14 nov. 2024 à 02:39, Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
>> a
>> > > > écrit :
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>> Hi everyone,
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> Thank you for joining the table maintenance discussion today!
>> We
>> > > made
>> > > > > >>> significant progress, and here are the key takeaways:
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>   1. Clarified furthermore and reached consensus on
>> introducing
>> > > table
>> > > > > >>>   maintenance properties in Polaris to support for different
>> TMS
>> > > and
>> > > > > >>> promote
>> > > > > >>>   interoperability.
>> > > > > >>>   2. Agreed to proceed with Option 1, which stores metadata as
>> > > > > >>>   catalog/namespace/table properties.
>> > > > > >>>   3. Confirmed the new privileges to ensure that maintenance
>> > > > properties
>> > > > > >>>   are safeguarded from being altered by clients with existing
>> > write
>> > > > > >>> access.
>> > > > > >>>   4. Briefly discussed the support for customized maintenance
>> > > > policies
>> > > > > .
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> Next step:
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>   1. Will file maintenance properties related PRs per design
>> > > > > >>>   2. Will add more details for customized policy support.
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> *Note*: Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to record the meeting
>> due to
>> > > the
>> > > > > >> need
>> > > > > >>> for a Google premium account.
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> Yufei
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:10 AM Omar Al-Safi <
>> o...@oalsafi.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>> Thank you! Will try to be there
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2024, 18:55 Yufei Gu, <flyrain...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>>> Hi Omar, I sent the invitation to dev@polaris.apache.org,
>> as
>> > > well
>> > > > as
>> > > > > >>>> your
>> > > > > >>>>> email address.
>> > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>> Yufei
>> > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 9:51 AM Omar Al-Safi <
>> o...@oalsafi.com
>> > >
>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>> Thanks Yufei, is it possible to send the invitation to the
>> > > > > >>>>>> Polaris google group?
>> > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>> Regards,
>> > > > > >>>>>> Omar
>> > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 6:48 PM Yufei Gu <
>> > flyrain...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>> Hi folks,
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>> We are going to have another sync for table maintenance in
>> > > > > >> Polaris
>> > > > > >>>> per
>> > > > > >>>>>>> discussion with JB. Here are meeting details:
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>> Polaris Table maintenance sync
>> > > > > >>>>>>> Wednesday, November 13 · 10:00 – 11:00am
>> > > > > >>>>>>> Time zone: America/Los_Angeles
>> > > > > >>>>>>> Google Meet joining info
>> > > > > >>>>>>> Video call link: https://meet.google.com/nyy-ahmn-jqd
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>> Yufei
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 5:23 PM Yufei Gu <
>> > flyrain...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for joining the discussion. Sorry I
>> couldn't
>> > > > > >>> record
>> > > > > >>>>> the
>> > > > > >>>>>>>> session due to a tech issue. Here are meeting notes:
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   1. We discussed the boundary between Polaris and the
>> Table
>> > > > > >>>>>> Maintenance
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   System(TMS). We agreed that they should be separated
>> > > > > >> systems.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   2. A general agreement on the minimal metadata added to
>> > > > > >>> Polaris
>> > > > > >>>> to
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   support TMS, focusing on essential data needed for
>> > > > > >>>>> interoperability.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   3. A general consensus on option 1 to store metadata as
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   catalog/namespace/table properties. We could introduce
>> > > > > >> policy
>> > > > > >>>>>>> entities in
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   the future for other use cases, like column masking.
>> Will
>> > > > > >>>> address
>> > > > > >>>>>> two
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   feedbacks:
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>      1. Caching the table properties in the catalog to
>> > reduce
>> > > > > >> IO
>> > > > > >>>>> cost.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>      2. Introducing new permissions for table maintenance
>> > > > > >>> related
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>      metadata to prevent any clients with the write
>> > permission
>> > > > > >>> to
>> > > > > >>>>> mess
>> > > > > >>>>>>> up with
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>      them.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   4. Briefly touched on the communication module between
>> TMS
>> > > > > >> and
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   Polaris, as a long-term plan, an event system from
>> Polaris
>> > > > > >> is
>> > > > > >>>>>>> necessary,
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   not only benefits TMS, but also benefits other systems
>> > which
>> > > > > >>>>> consume
>> > > > > >>>>>>> change
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   from Polaris.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Next Steps:
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   1. Implement metadata storage as properties
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>      1. Design detailed schema for properties
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>      2. Figure out a way to be extensible for future
>> > > > > >> maintenance
>> > > > > >>>>>> policy
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>      or customized policies.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>      3. Add new permissions for new properties
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>   2. Begin planning for event system
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Yufei
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 12:25 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> > > > > >>>>> j...@nanthrax.net>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Yufei
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for scheduling this !
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> I should be able to join.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> For the community, will you be able to record ?
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Regards
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> JB
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:40 PM Yufei Gu <
>> > > > > >> flyrain...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Folks,
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I've scheduled a community sync to discuss table
>> > maintenance
>> > > > > >>> in
>> > > > > >>>>>>> Polaris
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this Thursday at 9 AM PST. Since we didn’t have a
>> chance
>> > to
>> > > > > >>> dive
>> > > > > >>>>>> into
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> this
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> topic during our last sync, this will be a dedicated
>> > session
>> > > > > >>> to
>> > > > > >>>>>> cover
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> it in
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> detail.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> *Updates to Note:* I've made some updates to the design
>> > > > > >>>> document,
>> > > > > >>>>>>> with a
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> particular focus on the approach for maintenance
>> metadata.
>> > > > > >> The
>> > > > > >>>>>>> document
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> now
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> favors *Option 1*, which involves leveraging table,
>> > > > > >> namespace,
>> > > > > >>>> and
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> catalog
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> properties for maintenance metadata.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please review the latest version of the design doc
>> before
>> > > > > >> the
>> > > > > >>>>>> meeting,
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> as
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> it will help us streamline the discussion.
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to everyone’s insights!
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Video call link: https://meet.google.com/opc-vath-mgb
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Design doc:
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pd_mzZcfvnUvcH98IbwsIYf4eryet1lQDfclKYx-t-M/edit?usp=sharing
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> <
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pd_mzZcfvnUvcH98IbwsIYf4eryet1lQDfclKYx-t-M/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&usd=2&usg=AOvVaw2V3IjIcadea8miDcKKSG9I
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Yufei
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to