Ah so sorry, I meant to include the proposed date of Thursday, January 16th for the meeting.
I think it's definitely worth including the relationship to notifications/events in the discussion, though tentatively my thinking so far is that while notifications can be supplemental to the federation implementation, it should be possible to initially proceed independently, and there should still be a reasonable federation experience without notifications as well. On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 5:14 AM Alex Dutra <alex.du...@dremio.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > Thanks for starting this discussion! > > The proposed time slot is generally OK for me, but what weekday do you > have in mind? I wouldn't be able to attend on some weekdays. > > Other than that, I was wondering how much of the Catalog Federation > work would have to be built on top of a yet-to-be-created notification > / event system. This topic has been mentioned already in 2 Polaris dev > mailing list threads: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/48fczg6okw9mos94o90tr347fbz9qc3b > https://lists.apache.org/thread/03yz5wolkvy8l7rbcwjnqdq1bl8p065v > > Besides, you also sparked a very interesting discussion on the Iceberg > dev mailing list a while ago where these 2 topics were intertwined: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zcv6qm9ysknrhfpg093qgnrkrolptcht > > So, maybe one of the first items that we need to discuss here is the > notification mechanism to use to synchronize between catalogs. Wdyt? > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:36 AM Dennis Huo <huoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I wanted to kick off next steps to drive forward the design discussion > for > > Polaris Catalog Federation: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q6eEytxb0btpOPcL8RtkULskOlYUCo_3FLvFRnHkzBY/edit?tab=t.0 > > > > In some of the prior community syncs I think folks expressed a desire to > > have some dedicated discussion time on the linked proposal and other > > related considerations. Tentatively, would 9AM Pacific (GMT-8) (6PM CET > > GMT+1) work for any folks who are interested in participating? > > > > I'd also like to use this thread to preemptively gather key areas folks > > want to cover in the discussion so that we can make the best use of > > everyone's time. Please feel free to respond with any suggestions on open > > design questions, missing areas of consideration, etc., you'd like to > cover. > > > > Otherwise, any input regarding timing of this design meeting, a simple +1 > > to indicate interest in participating, or even suggestions for a > different > > time would be much appreciated so we can ensure an inclusive quorum of > > interested parties. > > > > Cheers, > > Dennis >
