+1 Works for me (meeting on thursday) On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 8:56 PM Dennis Huo <huoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah so sorry, I meant to include the proposed date of Thursday, January 16th > for the meeting. > > I think it's definitely worth including the relationship to > notifications/events in the discussion, though tentatively my thinking so > far is that while notifications can be supplemental to the federation > implementation, it should be possible to initially proceed independently, > and there should still be a reasonable federation experience without > notifications as well. > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 5:14 AM Alex Dutra <alex.du...@dremio.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > Hi Dennis, > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion! > > > > The proposed time slot is generally OK for me, but what weekday do you > > have in mind? I wouldn't be able to attend on some weekdays. > > > > Other than that, I was wondering how much of the Catalog Federation > > work would have to be built on top of a yet-to-be-created notification > > / event system. This topic has been mentioned already in 2 Polaris dev > > mailing list threads: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/48fczg6okw9mos94o90tr347fbz9qc3b > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/03yz5wolkvy8l7rbcwjnqdq1bl8p065v > > > > Besides, you also sparked a very interesting discussion on the Iceberg > > dev mailing list a while ago where these 2 topics were intertwined: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zcv6qm9ysknrhfpg093qgnrkrolptcht > > > > So, maybe one of the first items that we need to discuss here is the > > notification mechanism to use to synchronize between catalogs. Wdyt? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alex > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:36 AM Dennis Huo <huoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I wanted to kick off next steps to drive forward the design discussion > > for > > > Polaris Catalog Federation: > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q6eEytxb0btpOPcL8RtkULskOlYUCo_3FLvFRnHkzBY/edit?tab=t.0 > > > > > > In some of the prior community syncs I think folks expressed a desire > to > > > have some dedicated discussion time on the linked proposal and other > > > related considerations. Tentatively, would 9AM Pacific (GMT-8) (6PM CET > > > GMT+1) work for any folks who are interested in participating? > > > > > > I'd also like to use this thread to preemptively gather key areas folks > > > want to cover in the discussion so that we can make the best use of > > > everyone's time. Please feel free to respond with any suggestions on > open > > > design questions, missing areas of consideration, etc., you'd like to > > cover. > > > > > > Otherwise, any input regarding timing of this design meeting, a simple > +1 > > > to indicate interest in participating, or even suggestions for a > > different > > > time would be much appreciated so we can ensure an inclusive quorum of > > > interested parties. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dennis > > >
