Mustache templates for server and client code are copied and modified from
https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/tree/master/modules/openapi-generator/src/main/resources/JavaJaxRS/resteasy

Mike

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:36 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> -1 because I think I’ve found copied source code that is not documented in
> the LICENSE file. I grepped for [Cc]opied and found that there are several
> mustache files that were copied from openapi-generator that are not
> documented in LICENSE. The openapi-generator project has an ALv2 LICENSE
> file with the following copyright:
>
> Copyright 2018 OpenAPI-Generator Contributors (
> https://openapi-generator.tech) Copyright 2018 SmartBear Software
>
> I didn’t find any other copied code, but I would encourage others to grep
> for phrases like “copied” to help us catch and document these.
>
> I also ran across the site folder that contains the Hugo site. I don’t
> think it is a problem to include the site, but I would generally recommend
> preventing other content in the repo from being included in the tarball.
> That makes the source tarball smaller (i.e. not sending blog posts and
> images in it) and also avoids potential problems in the future, where
> unrelated content (like build directories with third-party code) is
> included in the ASF release. In Iceberg, we limit what is in the tarball
> using git archive --worktree-attributes and a .gitattributes file that
> ignores certain patterns.
>
> Otherwise the release looks good. I checked:
>
>    - Validated signature and checksum
>    - Ran RAT checks
>    - Checked the disclaimer
>    - Checked that the binary license issues are no longer present (thanks,
>    JB!)
>    - Checked NOTICE content against entries in LICENSE (I don’t see
>    anything to carry over from gradle)
>    - Checked LICENSE updates about gradle (looks good)
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:07 PM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Verified
> > Checksum
> > Signatures - Note that me and JB need to verify each other's keys next
> time
> > we meet in person :)
> > Build and Test
> > Used runApp and poked to make sure nothing was broken
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 6:41 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (ns)
> > >
> > > Verified:
> > > * Checksum
> > > * Signarures
> > > * ./gradlew clean assemble
> > > * ./gradlew test
> > > * Start with in-memory MetaStore
> > > * Create catalog via ./polaris CLI with FILE storage
> > > * Basic  create table / select in Spark
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Dmitri.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 3:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > Following the NOTICE/LICENSE fix and the issue found on
> > > > TestPolarisVersion in rc3, we fixed the test compilation issue.
> > > >
> > > > This is the vote for Apache Polaris 0.9.0-incubating rc4.
> > > >
> > > > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating-rc4
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/tree/apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating-rc4
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/tree/37936f5157b37b8b7db2b8b1ebb86d9d067a353e
> > > >
> > > > The release source tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/0.9.0-incubating/
> > > >
> > > > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/polaris/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > NB: this release doesn't provide any binary distribution, it provides
> > > > source distribution only.
> > > >
> > > > Please download, verify, and test.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache polaris 0.9.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > > >
> > > > Only PPMC members and mentors have binding votes, but other community
> > > > members are encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass
> > > > if there are
> > > > 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
> > > >
> > > > NB: if this vote passes, a new vote will be started on the Incubator
> > > > general mailing list.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to