Hey Laurent,

For general concerns about generic tables, it may be best to revisit some
of the threads about that design. There’s a proposal doc from February that
discusses some of the questions you raise here. I’m not sure if it makes
sense to relitigate the generic tables design every time an extension to it
is proposed.

—EM

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 5:45 PM Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Same comment as in the other thread regarding location and generic table:
> how are clients supposed to interact with this format? Could we have a
> detailed discussion about the protocol between the catalog and the query
> engine?
>
> Laurent
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025, 17:01 Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I am on the Hudi PMC. This will nicely augment our HMS++ metastore and
> > Apache Gravitino support. Bring a lot of benefits to both Hudi and
> Polaris
> > communities.
> >
> > On 2025/06/13 22:54:43 yun zou wrote:
> > > Hi Rahil,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for working on this! This is definitely one valuable
> feature
> > > improvement for
> > > the Spark Client support, I am really looking forward to that!
> > >
> > > The overall approach looks good to me!
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Yun
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 3:47 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the proposal. +1 on adding Hudi support. Since Hudi
> doesn’t
> > > > currently have an IRC (Iceberg REST Catalog)-like specification, the
> > > > proposed approach looks reasonable.
> > > >
> > > > Yufei
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 8:41 AM Rahil C <rchert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to start a discussion about adding support for Apache
> > Hudi
> > > > > tables within Apache Polaris.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was able to look into the recent integration that was done for
> > adding
> > > > > Delta as a Generic Table within Polaris
> > > > > <
> https://polaris.apache.org/in-dev/unreleased/polaris-spark-client/
> > >,
> > > > and
> > > > > believe that we can do an approach for Hudi that adds changes to
> the
> > > > > Polaris Spark Plugin that follows a similar pattern.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have put out an initial "draft" pr here, which more concretely
> > > > > demonstrates this integration:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1862
> > > > >
> > > > > Would appreciate thoughts/guidance from the community on how we can
> > > > support
> > > > > this initiative.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Rahil Chertara
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to