Thanks for the proposal Rahil ! I am also a +1 to the proposal considering this is just extending spark client functionality.
Thanks Vinoth for attesting it, It's really awesome to see these 2 communities collaborating, definitely it will bring benefits to both of us ! Looking forward to this change ! Best, Prashant Singh On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:48 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Rahil > > It's interesting, thanks for that. As a first step, the approach > corresponds to the one used for Delta. > > Long term, I would love to see support on other table formats directly > in the catalog (without the need of a fat client, I already mentioned > that while ago). > > So , +1 for now, but I still think we should consider no fat client in > the future. > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 5:32 PM Rahil C <rchert...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to start a discussion about adding support for Apache Hudi > > tables within Apache Polaris. > > > > I was able to look into the recent integration that was done for adding > > Delta as a Generic Table within Polaris > > <https://polaris.apache.org/in-dev/unreleased/polaris-spark-client/>, > and > > believe that we can do an approach for Hudi that adds changes to the > > Polaris Spark Plugin that follows a similar pattern. > > > > I have put out an initial "draft" pr here, which more concretely > > demonstrates this integration: > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1862 > > > > Would appreciate thoughts/guidance from the community on how we can > support > > this initiative. > > > > Regards, > > Rahil Chertara >
