Sung, Tuesday 9am PT fortnightly, starting with Mar-24, works for me.
Thank you for initiating this sync. Madhan On 3/19/26, 3:01 PM, "Dennis Huo" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1, those are some juicy topics that we need to work through sooner rather than later Tues 12 ET works for me as well. On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 2:59 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi Sung, > > Good idea. I think a dedicated sync call for AuthZ work will be very > beneficial... at least for a few rounds. > > Tue 12:00 ET works for me. > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 3:57 PM Sung Yun <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Correction: Tuesday, March 24th is the proposed starting day of this > > fortnightly sync :) > > > > Let me know your thoughts. > > > > Sung > > > > On 2026/03/19 18:29:52 Sung Yun wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Following the discussion in the Polaris community sync, it seems like > we > > > could benefit from a dedicated forum to work through the > > PolarisAuthorizer > > > SPI and related questions. > > > > > > Some topics we can start with include: > > > > > > - Decoupling Polaris resolution and privilege from Polaris > authorization > > > - Mixed-mode authorization (continuing to use native principals and > > grants > > > after decoupling) > > > - Contract with external authorizers for Polaris (e.g., > > > PolarisAuthorizableOperation, PolarisEntityType) > > > - Incorporating additional authorization context > > > > > > I’d like to propose a fortnightly authorization sync to drive these > > topics > > > forward. > > > > > > I’m thinking Tuesdays at 12:00 PM ET (9:00 AM PT), starting March 25 > (the > > > second sequence will be April 7th, and on). I’m happy to send out a > > > calendar invite if there is general support in the community on the > idea. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Sung > > > > > >
