Thanks a lot JB! Confirming that I'm able to see the new recurring sync on my Google calendar.
I'm looking forward to syncing up with everyone tomorrow at 1pm ET / 10am PT. Cheers, Sung On 2026/03/23 09:55:47 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > The invite has been sent. Anyone member of the Polaris Google Group will > receive it. > > Here's the invite details: > > Polaris Authorizer Sync Meeting > 10am PT > Video call link: https://meet.google.com/hyj-fcdm-ydx > > NB: I'm creating a Calendar that will create a PR to share on the website. > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Sung, > > > > I propose moving the sync to 10:00 AM PT (starting March 24th) to avoid a > > conflict with the Iceberg meeting. > > > > I am sending the calendar invitation now. > > > > Regards, > > JB > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 12:52 AM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi JB, that'll be fantastic. > >> > >> It looks like we have enough members interested in joining the sync. > >> > >> Could I ask for your help in adding a meeting to the Polaris Agenda group > >> [1], for Tuesdays at 12:00 PM ET (9:00 AM PT), starting March 24th? > >> > >> Thanks a lot JB. And here's the Google Doc [2] I created where we can > >> keep track of the discussion topics for the sync as well. > >> > >> Looking forward to discussing auth with everyone. > >> > >> Sung > >> > >> [1] https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/polaris-community-sync > >> [2] > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C_SSaZH1i83UUGXrnVBur1fR_FHKYWZ75ISFfcb3kns/edit?tab=t.0 > >> > >> On 2026/03/20 14:15:40 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > As discussed together, I think it's a great idea. > >> > > >> > I'm happy to add a meeting (recorded) on the Polaris agenda (Google > >> Group). > >> > > >> > On a related topic, I will create a PR to add a Calendar with all our > >> > meetings on our website. > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > JB > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 7:30 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi folks, > >> > > > >> > > Following the discussion in the Polaris community sync, it seems like > >> we > >> > > could benefit from a dedicated forum to work through the > >> PolarisAuthorizer > >> > > SPI and related questions. > >> > > > >> > > Some topics we can start with include: > >> > > > >> > > - Decoupling Polaris resolution and privilege from Polaris > >> authorization > >> > > - Mixed-mode authorization (continuing to use native principals and > >> grants > >> > > after decoupling) > >> > > - Contract with external authorizers for Polaris (e.g., > >> > > PolarisAuthorizableOperation, PolarisEntityType) > >> > > - Incorporating additional authorization context > >> > > > >> > > I’d like to propose a fortnightly authorization sync to drive these > >> topics > >> > > forward. > >> > > > >> > > I’m thinking Tuesdays at 12:00 PM ET (9:00 AM PT), starting March 25 > >> (the > >> > > second sequence will be April 7th, and on). I’m happy to send out a > >> > > calendar invite if there is general support in the community on the > >> idea. > >> > > > >> > > Cheers, > >> > > > >> > > Sung > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
