[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb updated POLYGENE-273:
--------------------------
Description:
It looks like all references to Qi4j were replaced by Zest and then by Polygene.
However that makes a nonsense of historical references, for example in [1] it
now says:
{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just
humor me :p) called Apache Polygene™, written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}
On the Zest site it used to say:
{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just
humor me :p) called Zest™ (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard
Öberg
{code}
Presumably it was originally
{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just
humor me :p) called Qi4j (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}
There are other places where Polygene should still read Qi4j. e.g. the same
page has:
bq. As the Zest™ website proclaims
The bulk of the page is a direct copy of the original. As such, it should not
be editted.
However it would be helpful if the page made it clear which parts are part of
the original quote.
Perhaps surround it with a box? Or use a different background or font?
was:
It looks like all references to Qi4j were replaced by Zest and then by Polygene.
However that makes a nonsense of historical references, for example in [1] it
now says:
{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just
humor me :p) called Apache Polygene™, written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}
On the Zest site it used to say:
{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just
humor me :p) called Zest™ (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard
Öberg
{code}
Presumably it was originally
{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just
humor me :p) called Qi4j (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}
There are other places where Polygene should still read Qi4j. e.g. the same
page has:
bq. As the Zest™ website proclaims
The bulk of the page is a direct copy of the original. As such, it should nt be
editted.
However it would be helpful if the page made it clear which parts are part of
the original quote.
> Incorrect replacement by Zest/Polygene
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: POLYGENE-273
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-273
> Project: Polygene
> Issue Type: Bug
> Environment: [1]
> https://polygene.apache.org/java/latest/what-is-cop.html
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> It looks like all references to Qi4j were replaced by Zest and then by
> Polygene.
> However that makes a nonsense of historical references, for example in [1] it
> now says:
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework
> (just humor me :p) called Apache Polygene™, written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> On the Zest site it used to say:
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework
> (just humor me :p) called Zest™ (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish
> Richard Öberg
> {code}
> Presumably it was originally
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework
> (just humor me :p) called Qi4j (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish
> Richard Öberg
> {code}
> There are other places where Polygene should still read Qi4j. e.g. the same
> page has:
> bq. As the Zest™ website proclaims
> The bulk of the page is a direct copy of the original. As such, it should not
> be editted.
> However it would be helpful if the page made it clear which parts are part of
> the original quote.
> Perhaps surround it with a box? Or use a different background or font?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
