charge. So for outside developers and users a headless Mac Port is close to a dead Mac Port and they switch over to NeoOffice/J, iWork or stick with MSO.
This is very much an OT on this list I suppose, but comparing NO to iWorks or MSO is really strange since using NO means promoting the OOo/OD file format which means in the end more OOo users.
I really don't understand what is this problem with NO that everybody on the OOo lists seem to have.
Work to port OOo on X11/OSX is just as important as what the NO team does since it promotes your work to people who would never think of using OOo in the first place. Besides, Luby has made code donations that support your efforts.
Could we stop the FUD about NO please ?
Regards, JC Helary
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
