In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pavel Janík) wrote:
Hello, > Please forget about various methods of distributing something we do not > have yet (this also applies to "official" distribution Eric B. is talking > about). The first thing we need to do, is to make our own builds (we all > build from source) stable/usable. Than we can think of installer or other > means of distribution. Doing it backwards is nonsense and waste of time. I'm only interested in buildablity. and what patches are req'ed to build etc. Then, what is the most easy way to maintain the list of patches like I'm posting to this ML and make it easy for others to confirm whether my patches are correct or not? For FreeBSD it is not necessary, since these things can be hosted at port freamwork. Everything is very very clear. Well, I don't have to post a summerize of patches for specific milestone. Buildability of OOo is extremely important. So that others (inc. me) can concentrate on fixing real bugs. this will never be stable until it really become stable and my effort won't interfere with others. -- NAKATA, Maho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
