Eric Hoch wrote:
Hi James, Am Tue, 10 May 2005 22:09:49 -0700, schrieb James McKenzie:This breaks the registry build, that is why I put the patch in and it was on the 1.1.2 tree (from what I remember.) I found it in a group of messages referencing this.
Greetings:
I'm having difficulties building OO 1.1.4 after applying the registry/source/regimpl.cxx patch in udkapi and receive the following error:
You're sure that you need this patch. A short overview of my backups for old 1.1.x builds showed me no patch for udkapi or regimpl.cxx in patch folders for 1.1.2, 1.1.3 and 1.1.4. I may be wrong. So please wait and see if Eric Bachard answers you. He was the last one building OOo 1.1.4 using Panther and Tiger. He should know if this patch is necessary or not.
What happens if you revers this patch and build udkapi? Does udkapi break?
I could reverse the patch and look up how to build an individual project, but what I want to do is a clean build (no individual projects) of OOo 1.1.4 or even look at OOo 1.1.5 for MacOSX Jaguar/Tiger. I don't have Panther (I bought my Mac about three months ago.)
Also, I am going to apply the November, 2004 gcc 3.3 patch.
James McKenzie
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
