Hi Maho, Am Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:40:57 +0900 (JST), schrieb NAKATA Maho: > In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Florian Heckl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> On 06.06.2005, at 23:24, eric.bachard wrote: >> >> >>> If you want you can begin to fix everything needed for build OOo >>> with gcc4.0, open all necessary issue for this, and when we are >>> sure, we change for gcc4.0 ? > both. > >> Sounds good to me. I might have another go next week or later this >> week with the new gcc 4 that Apple ships with Xcode 2.1. > > ericb: there are two issues > o hardcoding to g++ is apparently wrong. > o smooth change to gcc-4.0 if we don't use gcc-4.0 atm, still > forcing user to execute gcc_select is also apparently wrong.
You are right but I guess we will not have the time to move to gcc 4.0 and release 2.0 in a sustainable time frame that is not that much behind the major plattforms Solaris, Windows and Linux. I'm not a coder and I may be totally wrong but what I heard from Florian so far let me come to this conclusion. So we have to decided wether we want a gcc 4.0 2.0 OOo for Mac OS X which may delay release for some more weeks or if we want a gcc 3.3 2.0 OpenOffice.org which forces users to execute gcc_select. I can make a big note for Tiger users wanting to compile OOo that they need to do a sudo gcc_select before starting the build process of OOo 680. Mit freundlichen Gr��en Eric Hoch -- ## Ansprechpartner Anwenderunterst�tzung, users-Mailingliste, MacOSX ## de.OpenOffice.org - Office f�r MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows ## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
