hi Florian, > --- Urspr�ngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Florian Heckl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [porting-dev] gcc_select 3.3? > Datum: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:54:58 -0700 > > Hi Eric, others, > > On 08.06.2005, at 01:21, Eric Hoch wrote: > > >> ericb: there are two issues > >> o hardcoding to g++ is apparently wrong. > >> o smooth change to gcc-4.0 if we don't use gcc-4.0 atm, still > >> forcing user to execute gcc_select is also apparently wrong. > >> > > > > So we have to decided wether we want a gcc 4.0 2.0 OOo for Mac OS X > > which may delay release for some more weeks or if we want a gcc 3.3 > > 2.0 OpenOffice.org which forces users to execute gcc_select. > > We do NOT force USERS to execute this command, but BUILDERS which may > be users too, but...
you're absolutely right. My fault. I had the right word in mind but typed the wrong one. Regards, Eric -- Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail gratis + 3 Ausgaben stern gratis ++ Jetzt anmelden & testen ++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail ++ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
