In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Takashi Ono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ono sama! > I quite agree with you but I have no good idea how to split the patches. okay. > One idea is to split them by projects but as most of makefiles are affected, > it may > become piles of too many fragments. > > Maybe it makes sense to split them into global parts (config_office, solenv, > scp?), > project with only obvious modifications (makefile modification to cope with > library > naming convention and source modification to cope with language > incompatibility of > the compiler only), and some parts including only one project which requires > essential modification. Right. Issue must have a clear explanation. if something went wrong it is very hard for us to track. one idea from me is original issue set to be a task and write the direction of your work. how you patch set_soenv, config_office etc. just abstract things. then break things into several parts. this part should be more specific. -- NAKATA, Maho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
