eric.bachard wrote: > Hi James, > > I'm sorry, but I completely agree with Pavel : development process > must be respected.
And I agree. I stated that you should go through the entire CVS QA process, not just blindly add this to the existing code. > > I was in a hurry for fondu -> 2.0.1. That's it :-) > It looks good from where I stand, but maybe the DoubleByte languages, such as Japanese, Korean or Chinese will be broken. > > The positive part is that with all feedback I have, I'll provide a > more robust version of fondu, including Etsushi Kato's patch, for > Japanese community. > I'm glad that Kato found the problem and proposed a working fix. Will you be going through the formal process (creating a new cws and QA) to get this integrated into OOo 2.0/2.0.1? Respectfully, James --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
